SNOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of -41.27% compared to Snowflake's net margin of 15.68%. Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.42%.

Snowflake has a consensus price target of $230.66, signalling upside risk potential of 8.83%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $349.52 which suggests that it could grow by 35.5%. Given that Salesforce has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Salesforce is more attractive than Snowflake.

Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.365, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.456%.

Snowflake has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Snowflake pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snowflake quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M is lower than Salesforce's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Snowflake's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Salesforce's PE ratio is 40.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowflake is 18.35x versus 6.48x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -41.27% compared to Snowflake's net margin of 36.86%. Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Snowflake has a consensus price target of $230.66, signalling upside risk potential of 8.83%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $533.79 which suggests that it could grow by 5.57%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Microsoft.

Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Snowflake has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Snowflake pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snowflake quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Snowflake's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowflake is 18.35x versus 13.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oracle has a net margin of -41.27% compared to Snowflake's net margin of 21.55%. Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99% beat Oracle's return on equity of 85.26%.

Snowflake has a consensus price target of $230.66, signalling upside risk potential of 8.83%. On the other hand Oracle has an analysts' consensus of $225.70 which suggests that it could fall by -6.47%. Given that Snowflake has higher upside potential than Oracle, analysts believe Snowflake is more attractive than Oracle.

Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oracle has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.493%.

Snowflake has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Oracle offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Snowflake pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle pays out 38.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Oracle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snowflake quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Oracle quarterly revenues of $15.9B. Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M is lower than Oracle's net income of $3.4B. Notably, Snowflake's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Oracle's PE ratio is 55.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowflake is 18.35x versus 12.05x for Oracle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zoom Communications has a net margin of -41.27% compared to Snowflake's net margin of 21.67%. Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99% beat Zoom Communications's return on equity of 12.1%.

Snowflake has a consensus price target of $230.66, signalling upside risk potential of 8.83%. On the other hand Zoom Communications has an analysts' consensus of $91.14 which suggests that it could grow by 22.44%. Given that Zoom Communications has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Zoom Communications is more attractive than Snowflake.

Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zoom Communications has a beta of 0.678, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.152%.

Snowflake has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zoom Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snowflake pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zoom Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Snowflake quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Zoom Communications quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M is lower than Zoom Communications's net income of $254.6M. Notably, Snowflake's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zoom Communications's PE ratio is 22.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snowflake is 18.35x versus 4.98x for Zoom Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.