HBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -1.24% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of -3528.43%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -230.99% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of $6.76, signalling upside risk potential of 53%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Hanesbrands has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Hanesbrands is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.473, which suggesting that the stock is 47.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $760.1M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Hanesbrands's net income of -$9.5M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.45x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northann has a net margin of -1.24% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of --. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -230.99% beat Northann's return on equity of --.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of $6.76, signalling upside risk potential of 53%. On the other hand Northann has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hanesbrands has higher upside potential than Northann, analysts believe Hanesbrands is more attractive than Northann.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.473, which suggesting that the stock is 47.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northann has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Northann offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northann pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $760.1M, which are larger than Northann quarterly revenues of --. Hanesbrands's net income of -$9.5M is higher than Northann's net income of --. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Northann's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.45x versus 0.32x for Northann. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of -1.24% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of 7.6%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -230.99% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 29.99%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of $6.76, signalling upside risk potential of 53%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $308.95 which suggests that it could grow by 8.52%. Given that Hanesbrands has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Hanesbrands is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.473, which suggesting that the stock is 47.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.488, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.75%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 27.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $760.1M, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Hanesbrands's net income of -$9.5M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $129M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.45x versus 2.57x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Under Armour has a net margin of -1.24% compared to Hanesbrands's net margin of -5.71%. Hanesbrands's return on equity of -230.99% beat Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24%.

Hanesbrands has a consensus price target of $6.76, signalling upside risk potential of 53%. On the other hand Under Armour has an analysts' consensus of $7.55 which suggests that it could grow by 12.82%. Given that Hanesbrands has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe Hanesbrands is more attractive than Under Armour.

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.473, which suggesting that the stock is 47.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Under Armour has a beta of 1.614, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.36%.

Hanesbrands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Under Armour offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hanesbrands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Under Armour pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hanesbrands quarterly revenues are $760.1M, which are smaller than Under Armour quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Hanesbrands's net income of -$9.5M is higher than Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M. Notably, Hanesbrands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Under Armour's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hanesbrands is 0.45x versus 0.56x for Under Armour. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.