UAA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hanesbrands has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of -1.24%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat Hanesbrands's return on equity of -230.99%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $7.55, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Hanesbrands has an analysts' consensus of $6.76 which suggests that it could grow by 53%. Given that Hanesbrands has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe Hanesbrands is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.473, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.281%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hanesbrands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hanesbrands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Hanesbrands quarterly revenues of $760.1M. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Hanesbrands's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Hanesbrands's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.56x versus 0.45x for Hanesbrands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Movado Group has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 1.08%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat Movado Group's return on equity of 3.39%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $7.55, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Movado Group has an analysts' consensus of $31.50 which suggests that it could grow by 94.09%. Given that Movado Group has higher upside potential than Under Armour, analysts believe Movado Group is more attractive than Under Armour.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Movado Group has a beta of 1.189, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.901%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Movado Group offers a yield of 8.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Movado Group pays out 169.18% of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Movado Group quarterly revenues of $131.8M. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Movado Group's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Movado Group's PE ratio is 20.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.56x versus 0.56x for Movado Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nike has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 1.9%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat Nike's return on equity of 23.12%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $7.55, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Nike has an analysts' consensus of $75.77 which suggests that it could grow by 5.09%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Nike, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Nike.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nike has a beta of 1.250, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.963%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nike offers a yield of 2.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nike pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Nike quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Nike's net income of $211M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Nike's PE ratio is 33.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.56x versus 2.32x for Nike. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of -5.71% compared to Under Armour's net margin of 7.6%. Under Armour's return on equity of -10.24% beat Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 29.99%.

Under Armour has a consensus price target of $7.55, signalling upside risk potential of 12.82%. On the other hand Ralph Lauren has an analysts' consensus of $308.95 which suggests that it could grow by 8.52%. Given that Under Armour has higher upside potential than Ralph Lauren, analysts believe Under Armour is more attractive than Ralph Lauren.

Under Armour has a beta of 1.614, which suggesting that the stock is 61.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.488, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.75%.

Under Armour has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ralph Lauren offers a yield of 1.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Under Armour pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 27.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Ralph Lauren's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Under Armour quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Ralph Lauren quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Under Armour's net income of -$67.5M is lower than Ralph Lauren's net income of $129M. Notably, Under Armour's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.53x while Ralph Lauren's PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Under Armour is 0.56x versus 2.57x for Ralph Lauren. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.