DRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 1.53%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 47.83% beat Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's return on equity of 12.91%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $229.61, signalling upside risk potential of 10.47%. On the other hand Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has an analysts' consensus of $55.14 which suggests that it could fall by -16.44%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cracker Barrel Old Country Store has a beta of 1.454, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.43%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 62.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store pays out 283.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's is not.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store quarterly revenues of $821.1M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $303.8M is higher than Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's net income of $12.6M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.45x while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store's PE ratio is 25.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.04x versus 0.42x for Cracker Barrel Old Country Store. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brinker International has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 8.36%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 47.83% beat Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $229.61, signalling upside risk potential of 10.47%. On the other hand Brinker International has an analysts' consensus of $169.95 which suggests that it could grow by 2.27%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Brinker International.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brinker International has a beta of 1.698, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.785%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Brinker International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 62.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International pays out 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Brinker International quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $303.8M is higher than Brinker International's net income of $119.1M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.45x while Brinker International's PE ratio is 22.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.04x versus 1.50x for Brinker International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Shake Shack has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 1.32%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 47.83% beat Shake Shack's return on equity of 2.56%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $229.61, signalling upside risk potential of 10.47%. On the other hand Shake Shack has an analysts' consensus of $127.29 which suggests that it could fall by -7.01%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Shake Shack, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Shake Shack.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Shake Shack has a beta of 1.771, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.067%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Shake Shack offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 62.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Shake Shack pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Shake Shack quarterly revenues of $320.9M. Darden Restaurants's net income of $303.8M is higher than Shake Shack's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.45x while Shake Shack's PE ratio is 488.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.04x versus 4.47x for Shake Shack. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 9.29% compared to Darden Restaurants's net margin of 7.85%. Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 47.83% beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 32.92%.

Darden Restaurants has a consensus price target of $229.61, signalling upside risk potential of 10.47%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $192.27 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Texas Roadhouse, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Texas Roadhouse.

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.739, which suggesting that the stock is 26.058% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.870, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.994%.

Darden Restaurants has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Darden Restaurants pays 62.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues are $3.3B, which are larger than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Darden Restaurants's net income of $303.8M is higher than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $113.7M. Notably, Darden Restaurants's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.45x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 28.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Darden Restaurants is 2.04x versus 2.24x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.