EAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cheesecake Factory has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 3.55%. Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07% beat Cheesecake Factory's return on equity of 41.51%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $169.95, signalling upside risk potential of 2.27%. On the other hand Cheesecake Factory has an analysts' consensus of $59.88 which suggests that it could fall by -3.97%. Given that Brinker International has higher upside potential than Cheesecake Factory, analysts believe Brinker International is more attractive than Cheesecake Factory.

Brinker International has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cheesecake Factory has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.907%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cheesecake Factory offers a yield of 1.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Cheesecake Factory pays out 33.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Cheesecake Factory quarterly revenues of $927.2M. Brinker International's net income of $119.1M is higher than Cheesecake Factory's net income of $32.9M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.92x while Cheesecake Factory's PE ratio is 19.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.50x versus 0.85x for Cheesecake Factory. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Darden Restaurants has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 9.29%. Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07% beat Darden Restaurants's return on equity of 47.83%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $169.95, signalling upside risk potential of 2.27%. On the other hand Darden Restaurants has an analysts' consensus of $229.61 which suggests that it could grow by 10.47%. Given that Darden Restaurants has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Darden Restaurants is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Darden Restaurants has a beta of 0.739, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.058%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Darden Restaurants offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Darden Restaurants pays out 62.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Darden Restaurants quarterly revenues of $3.3B. Brinker International's net income of $119.1M is lower than Darden Restaurants's net income of $303.8M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.92x while Darden Restaurants's PE ratio is 23.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.50x versus 2.04x for Darden Restaurants. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kura Sushi USA has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 0.76%. Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07% beat Kura Sushi USA's return on equity of -4.65%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $169.95, signalling upside risk potential of 2.27%. On the other hand Kura Sushi USA has an analysts' consensus of $94.67 which suggests that it could grow by 28.24%. Given that Kura Sushi USA has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Kura Sushi USA is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kura Sushi USA has a beta of 1.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.111%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kura Sushi USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Kura Sushi USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brinker International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Kura Sushi USA quarterly revenues of $74M. Brinker International's net income of $119.1M is higher than Kura Sushi USA's net income of $565K. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.92x while Kura Sushi USA's PE ratio is 732.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.50x versus 3.23x for Kura Sushi USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Texas Roadhouse has a net margin of 8.36% compared to Brinker International's net margin of 7.85%. Brinker International's return on equity of 421.07% beat Texas Roadhouse's return on equity of 32.92%.

Brinker International has a consensus price target of $169.95, signalling upside risk potential of 2.27%. On the other hand Texas Roadhouse has an analysts' consensus of $192.27 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that Texas Roadhouse has higher upside potential than Brinker International, analysts believe Texas Roadhouse is more attractive than Brinker International.

Brinker International has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.785% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Roadhouse has a beta of 0.870, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.994%.

Brinker International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Roadhouse offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Brinker International pays 0.13% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Roadhouse pays out 37.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brinker International quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Texas Roadhouse quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Brinker International's net income of $119.1M is higher than Texas Roadhouse's net income of $113.7M. Notably, Brinker International's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.92x while Texas Roadhouse's PE ratio is 28.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brinker International is 1.50x versus 2.24x for Texas Roadhouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.