CDNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Autodesk has a net margin of 22.02% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 9.31%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 40.52%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $328.11, signalling upside risk potential of 3.17%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $340.21 which suggests that it could grow by 17.74%. Given that Autodesk has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Autodesk is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.944%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M is higher than Autodesk's net income of $152M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.52x while Autodesk's PE ratio is 61.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 17.87x versus 9.87x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datadog has a net margin of 22.02% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 3.24%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76% beat Datadog's return on equity of 6.44%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $328.11, signalling upside risk potential of 3.17%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $142.76 which suggests that it could grow by 1.56%. Given that Cadence Design Systems has higher upside potential than Datadog, analysts believe Cadence Design Systems is more attractive than Datadog.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.026, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.629%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Datadog quarterly revenues of $761.6M. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M is higher than Datadog's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.52x while Datadog's PE ratio is 305.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 17.87x versus 17.85x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 22.02% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 36.86%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $328.11, signalling upside risk potential of 3.17%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $531.65 which suggests that it could grow by 5.11%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 1.037, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.675%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.52x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 39.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 17.87x versus 13.99x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synopsys has a net margin of 22.02% compared to Cadence Design Systems's net margin of 21.53%. Cadence Design Systems's return on equity of 24.76% beat Synopsys's return on equity of 25.05%.

Cadence Design Systems has a consensus price target of $328.11, signalling upside risk potential of 3.17%. On the other hand Synopsys has an analysts' consensus of $605.16 which suggests that it could grow by 6.34%. Given that Synopsys has higher upside potential than Cadence Design Systems, analysts believe Synopsys is more attractive than Cadence Design Systems.

Cadence Design Systems has a beta of 0.988, which suggesting that the stock is 1.194% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synopsys has a beta of 1.124, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.37%.

Cadence Design Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Synopsys offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cadence Design Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Synopsys pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cadence Design Systems quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Synopsys quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Cadence Design Systems's net income of $273.6M is lower than Synopsys's net income of $345.3M. Notably, Cadence Design Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 80.52x while Synopsys's PE ratio is 41.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cadence Design Systems is 17.87x versus 14.28x for Synopsys. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.