VLVLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 15.44%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 24.75% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 27.18%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.36%. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.355, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.541%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Volvo AB pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 45.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.4B, which are larger than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4B. Volvo AB's net income of $927.3M is higher than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $618.6M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.02x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 28.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.16x versus 4.79x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Husqvarna AB has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 6.6%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 24.75% beat Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 3.85%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.36%. On the other hand Husqvarna AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.629%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Husqvarna AB offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Volvo AB pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Husqvarna AB pays out 129.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Volvo AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Husqvarna AB's is not.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.4B, which are larger than Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Volvo AB's net income of $927.3M is higher than Husqvarna AB's net income of $90.9M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.02x while Husqvarna AB's PE ratio is 34.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.16x versus 0.69x for Husqvarna AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik AB has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 12.75%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 24.75% beat Sandvik AB's return on equity of 15.69%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.36%. On the other hand Sandvik AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than Sandvik AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik AB has a beta of 1.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.437%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. Sandvik AB offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Volvo AB pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik AB pays out 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.4B, which are larger than Sandvik AB quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Volvo AB's net income of $927.3M is higher than Sandvik AB's net income of $350.3M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.02x while Sandvik AB's PE ratio is 22.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.16x versus 2.63x for Sandvik AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SKF AB has a net margin of 8.12% compared to Volvo AB's net margin of 7.49%. Volvo AB's return on equity of 24.75% beat SKF AB's return on equity of 10.6%.

Volvo AB has a consensus price target of $36.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.36%. On the other hand SKF AB has an analysts' consensus of $22.40 which suggests that it could fall by -3.32%. Given that Volvo AB has higher upside potential than SKF AB, analysts believe Volvo AB is more attractive than SKF AB.

Volvo AB has a beta of 1.179, which suggesting that the stock is 17.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SKF AB has a beta of 1.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.014%.

Volvo AB has a quarterly dividend of $1.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.87%. SKF AB offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Volvo AB pays 72.64% of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB pays out 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Volvo AB quarterly revenues are $11.4B, which are larger than SKF AB quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Volvo AB's net income of $927.3M is higher than SKF AB's net income of $168.4M. Notably, Volvo AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.02x while SKF AB's PE ratio is 17.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Volvo AB is 1.16x versus 1.14x for SKF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.