HSQVY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlas Copco AB has a net margin of 6.6% compared to Husqvarna AB's net margin of 15.44%. Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 3.85% beat Atlas Copco AB's return on equity of 27.18%.

Husqvarna AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Atlas Copco AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Husqvarna AB has higher upside potential than Atlas Copco AB, analysts believe Husqvarna AB is more attractive than Atlas Copco AB.

Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.766, which suggesting that the stock is 76.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Copco AB has a beta of 1.355, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.541%.

Husqvarna AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Atlas Copco AB offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Husqvarna AB pays 129.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB pays out 45.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Copco AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Husqvarna AB's is not.

Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Atlas Copco AB quarterly revenues of $4B. Husqvarna AB's net income of $90.9M is lower than Atlas Copco AB's net income of $618.6M. Notably, Husqvarna AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.44x while Atlas Copco AB's PE ratio is 28.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Husqvarna AB is 0.69x versus 4.79x for Atlas Copco AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Precise Biometrics AB has a net margin of 6.6% compared to Husqvarna AB's net margin of --. Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 3.85% beat Precise Biometrics AB's return on equity of --.

Husqvarna AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Precise Biometrics AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Husqvarna AB has higher upside potential than Precise Biometrics AB, analysts believe Husqvarna AB is more attractive than Precise Biometrics AB.

Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.766, which suggesting that the stock is 76.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Precise Biometrics AB has a beta of -0.181, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 118.132%.

Husqvarna AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Precise Biometrics AB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Husqvarna AB pays 129.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Precise Biometrics AB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Precise Biometrics AB quarterly revenues of --. Husqvarna AB's net income of $90.9M is higher than Precise Biometrics AB's net income of --. Notably, Husqvarna AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.44x while Precise Biometrics AB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Husqvarna AB is 0.69x versus 2.25x for Precise Biometrics AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sandvik AB has a net margin of 6.6% compared to Husqvarna AB's net margin of 12.75%. Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 3.85% beat Sandvik AB's return on equity of 15.69%.

Husqvarna AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sandvik AB has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Husqvarna AB has higher upside potential than Sandvik AB, analysts believe Husqvarna AB is more attractive than Sandvik AB.

Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.766, which suggesting that the stock is 76.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sandvik AB has a beta of 1.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.437%.

Husqvarna AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Sandvik AB offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.60 per share. Husqvarna AB pays 129.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik AB pays out 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Sandvik AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Husqvarna AB's is not.

Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Sandvik AB quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Husqvarna AB's net income of $90.9M is lower than Sandvik AB's net income of $350.3M. Notably, Husqvarna AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.44x while Sandvik AB's PE ratio is 22.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Husqvarna AB is 0.69x versus 2.63x for Sandvik AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SKF AB has a net margin of 6.6% compared to Husqvarna AB's net margin of 7.49%. Husqvarna AB's return on equity of 3.85% beat SKF AB's return on equity of 10.6%.

Husqvarna AB has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SKF AB has an analysts' consensus of $22.40 which suggests that it could fall by -3.32%. Given that SKF AB has higher upside potential than Husqvarna AB, analysts believe SKF AB is more attractive than Husqvarna AB.

Husqvarna AB has a beta of 1.766, which suggesting that the stock is 76.629% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SKF AB has a beta of 1.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.014%.

Husqvarna AB has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. SKF AB offers a yield of 3.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Husqvarna AB pays 129.43% of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB pays out 59.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SKF AB's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Husqvarna AB's is not.

Husqvarna AB quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than SKF AB quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Husqvarna AB's net income of $90.9M is lower than SKF AB's net income of $168.4M. Notably, Husqvarna AB's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.44x while SKF AB's PE ratio is 17.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Husqvarna AB is 0.69x versus 1.14x for SKF AB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.