RNLSY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a net margin of -- compared to Renault SA's net margin of --. Renault SA's return on equity of 4.5% beat Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's return on equity of 18.98%.

Renault SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has an analysts' consensus of $150.04 which suggests that it could grow by 34.76%. Given that Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has higher upside potential than Renault SA, analysts believe Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE is more attractive than Renault SA.

Renault SA has a beta of 1.335, which suggesting that the stock is 33.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.468%.

Renault SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.21%. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Renault SA pays 71.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE pays out 51.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renault SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE quarterly revenues of --. Renault SA's net income of -- is lower than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's net income of --. Notably, Renault SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's PE ratio is 21.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renault SA is 0.18x versus 3.07x for Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Michelin has a net margin of -- compared to Renault SA's net margin of --. Renault SA's return on equity of 4.5% beat Michelin's return on equity of 10.73%.

Renault SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Michelin has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Renault SA has higher upside potential than Michelin, analysts believe Renault SA is more attractive than Michelin.

Renault SA has a beta of 1.335, which suggesting that the stock is 33.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Michelin has a beta of 1.028, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.782%.

Renault SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.21%. Michelin offers a yield of 4.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Renault SA pays 71.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Michelin pays out 51.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renault SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Michelin quarterly revenues of $6.9B. Renault SA's net income of -- is lower than Michelin's net income of $6.9B. Notably, Renault SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while Michelin's PE ratio is 12.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renault SA is 0.18x versus 0.87x for Michelin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kering SA has a net margin of -- compared to Renault SA's net margin of --. Renault SA's return on equity of 4.5% beat Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17%.

Renault SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Kering SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Renault SA has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Renault SA is more attractive than Kering SA.

Renault SA has a beta of 1.335, which suggesting that the stock is 33.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kering SA has a beta of 1.472, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.205%.

Renault SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.21%. Kering SA offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Renault SA pays 71.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Kering SA pays out 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Renault SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kering SA's is not.

Renault SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Kering SA quarterly revenues of --. Renault SA's net income of -- is lower than Kering SA's net income of --. Notably, Renault SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while Kering SA's PE ratio is 24.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renault SA is 0.18x versus 1.51x for Kering SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valeo SA has a net margin of -- compared to Renault SA's net margin of --. Renault SA's return on equity of 4.5% beat Valeo SA's return on equity of 3.67%.

Renault SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Valeo SA has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could grow by 28.3%. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than Renault SA, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than Renault SA.

Renault SA has a beta of 1.335, which suggesting that the stock is 33.493% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valeo SA has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.341%.

Renault SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.21%. Valeo SA offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Renault SA pays 71.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SA pays out 59.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renault SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valeo SA quarterly revenues of --. Renault SA's net income of -- is lower than Valeo SA's net income of --. Notably, Renault SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.57x while Valeo SA's PE ratio is 16.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renault SA is 0.18x versus 0.12x for Valeo SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.