PPRUY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hermes International SA has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17% beat Hermes International SA's return on equity of 29.01%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Hermes International SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kering SA has higher upside potential than Hermes International SA, analysts believe Kering SA is more attractive than Hermes International SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.472, which suggesting that the stock is 47.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hermes International SA has a beta of 1.188, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.778%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Hermes International SA offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.55 per share. Kering SA pays 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Hermes International SA pays out 58.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Hermes International SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kering SA's is not.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Hermes International SA quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Hermes International SA's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.13x while Hermes International SA's PE ratio is 58.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 1.51x versus 18.30x for Hermes International SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17% beat Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's return on equity of 18.98%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has an analysts' consensus of $150.04 which suggests that it could grow by 34.76%. Given that Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE is more attractive than Kering SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.472, which suggesting that the stock is 47.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.468%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Kering SA pays 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE pays out 51.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kering SA's is not.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.13x while Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE's PE ratio is 21.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 1.51x versus 3.07x for Lvmh Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Renault SA has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17% beat Renault SA's return on equity of 4.5%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Renault SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kering SA has higher upside potential than Renault SA, analysts believe Kering SA is more attractive than Renault SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.472, which suggesting that the stock is 47.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Renault SA has a beta of 1.335, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.493%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Renault SA offers a yield of 6.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Kering SA pays 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Renault SA pays out 71.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Renault SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kering SA's is not.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Renault SA quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Renault SA's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.13x while Renault SA's PE ratio is 16.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 1.51x versus 0.18x for Renault SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valeo SA has a net margin of -- compared to Kering SA's net margin of --. Kering SA's return on equity of 7.17% beat Valeo SA's return on equity of 3.67%.

Kering SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Valeo SA has an analysts' consensus of $7.30 which suggests that it could grow by 28.3%. Given that Valeo SA has higher upside potential than Kering SA, analysts believe Valeo SA is more attractive than Kering SA.

Kering SA has a beta of 1.472, which suggesting that the stock is 47.205% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valeo SA has a beta of 1.293, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.341%.

Kering SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.91%. Valeo SA offers a yield of 4.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Kering SA pays 151.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SA pays out 59.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Valeo SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kering SA's is not.

Kering SA quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Valeo SA quarterly revenues of --. Kering SA's net income of -- is lower than Valeo SA's net income of --. Notably, Kering SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.13x while Valeo SA's PE ratio is 16.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kering SA is 1.51x versus 0.12x for Valeo SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.