OWUV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blink Charging has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe's net margin of -100.55%. One World Universe's return on equity of -- beat Blink Charging's return on equity of -101.76%.

One World Universe has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blink Charging has an analysts' consensus of $2.25 which suggests that it could grow by 141.16%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than One World Universe.

One World Universe has a beta of 3.649, which suggesting that the stock is 264.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging has a beta of 3.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 222.615%.

One World Universe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Blink Charging quarterly revenues of $20.6M. One World Universe's net income of -- is lower than Blink Charging's net income of -$20.7M. Notably, One World Universe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blink Charging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe is -- versus 0.88x for Blink Charging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forrester Research has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe's net margin of -97.1%. One World Universe's return on equity of -- beat Forrester Research's return on equity of -40%.

One World Universe has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forrester Research has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.53%. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than One World Universe.

One World Universe has a beta of 3.649, which suggesting that the stock is 264.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forrester Research has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.068%.

One World Universe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forrester Research offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forrester Research pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Forrester Research quarterly revenues of $89.9M. One World Universe's net income of -- is lower than Forrester Research's net income of -$87.3M. Notably, One World Universe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forrester Research's PE ratio is 239.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe is -- versus 0.43x for Forrester Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Rock Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe's net margin of -117.27%. One World Universe's return on equity of -- beat Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -98.68%.

One World Universe has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Gold Rock Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that One World Universe has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe One World Universe is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

One World Universe has a beta of 3.649, which suggesting that the stock is 264.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 6,849.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 684840.708%.

One World Universe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Rock Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Rock Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues of $67.5K. One World Universe's net income of -- is lower than Gold Rock Holdings's net income of -$79.2K. Notably, One World Universe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Rock Holdings's PE ratio is 22.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe is -- versus 18.49x for Gold Rock Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to One World Universe's net margin of 45.43%. One World Universe's return on equity of -- beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 26.5%.

One World Universe has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.01 which suggests that it could grow by 14.7%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than One World Universe.

One World Universe has a beta of 3.649, which suggesting that the stock is 264.896% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

One World Universe has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. One World Universe pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

One World Universe quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $47.3M. One World Universe's net income of -- is lower than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $21.5M. Notably, One World Universe's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 10.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for One World Universe is -- versus 2.66x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.