GRHI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blink Charging has a net margin of -117.27% compared to Gold Rock Holdings's net margin of -100.55%. Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -98.68% beat Blink Charging's return on equity of -101.76%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Blink Charging has an analysts' consensus of $2.25 which suggests that it could grow by 141.16%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 6,849.407, which suggesting that the stock is 684840.708% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blink Charging has a beta of 3.226, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 222.615%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blink Charging offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Rock Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blink Charging pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues are $67.5K, which are smaller than Blink Charging quarterly revenues of $20.6M. Gold Rock Holdings's net income of -$79.2K is higher than Blink Charging's net income of -$20.7M. Notably, Gold Rock Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.86x while Blink Charging's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Rock Holdings is 18.49x versus 0.88x for Blink Charging. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forrester Research has a net margin of -117.27% compared to Gold Rock Holdings's net margin of -97.1%. Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -98.68% beat Forrester Research's return on equity of -40%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Forrester Research has an analysts' consensus of $14.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.53%. Given that Forrester Research has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe Forrester Research is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 6,849.407, which suggesting that the stock is 684840.708% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forrester Research has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.068%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forrester Research offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Rock Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forrester Research pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues are $67.5K, which are smaller than Forrester Research quarterly revenues of $89.9M. Gold Rock Holdings's net income of -$79.2K is higher than Forrester Research's net income of -$87.3M. Notably, Gold Rock Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.86x while Forrester Research's PE ratio is 239.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Rock Holdings is 18.49x versus 0.43x for Forrester Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

One World Universe has a net margin of -117.27% compared to Gold Rock Holdings's net margin of --. Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -98.68% beat One World Universe's return on equity of --.

Gold Rock Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand One World Universe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Gold Rock Holdings has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Gold Rock Holdings is more attractive than One World Universe.

Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 6,849.407, which suggesting that the stock is 684840.708% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison One World Universe has a beta of 3.649, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 264.896%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. One World Universe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Rock Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. One World Universe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues are $67.5K, which are larger than One World Universe quarterly revenues of --. Gold Rock Holdings's net income of -$79.2K is higher than One World Universe's net income of --. Notably, Gold Rock Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.86x while One World Universe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Rock Holdings is 18.49x versus -- for One World Universe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of -117.27% compared to Gold Rock Holdings's net margin of 45.43%. Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of -98.68% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 26.5%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $6.01 which suggests that it could grow by 14.7%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 6,849.407, which suggesting that the stock is 684840.708% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Gold Rock Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Gold Rock Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues are $67.5K, which are smaller than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $47.3M. Gold Rock Holdings's net income of -$79.2K is lower than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $21.5M. Notably, Gold Rock Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.86x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 10.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gold Rock Holdings is 18.49x versus 2.66x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.