NTDOY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Internet Initiative Japan has a net margin of 29.69% compared to Nintendo's net margin of 7.02%. Nintendo's return on equity of 10.43% beat Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92%.

Nintendo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Internet Initiative Japan has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nintendo has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe Nintendo is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Nintendo has a beta of 0.624, which suggesting that the stock is 37.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.959%.

Nintendo has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. Internet Initiative Japan offers a yield of 1.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Nintendo pays 69.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan pays out 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nintendo quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues of $574M. Nintendo's net income of $842.7M is higher than Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M. Notably, Nintendo's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.68x while Internet Initiative Japan's PE ratio is 23.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nintendo is 13.07x versus 1.48x for Internet Initiative Japan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NTT has a net margin of 29.69% compared to Nintendo's net margin of 8.55%. Nintendo's return on equity of 10.43% beat NTT's return on equity of 8.87%.

Nintendo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NTT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.12%. Given that NTT has higher upside potential than Nintendo, analysts believe NTT is more attractive than Nintendo.

Nintendo has a beta of 0.624, which suggesting that the stock is 37.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NTT has a beta of 0.177, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.273%.

Nintendo has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. NTT offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Nintendo pays 69.29% of its earnings as a dividend. NTT pays out 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nintendo quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are smaller than NTT quarterly revenues of $22.7B. Nintendo's net income of $842.7M is lower than NTT's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Nintendo's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.68x while NTT's PE ratio is 12.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nintendo is 13.07x versus 0.93x for NTT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of 29.69% compared to Nintendo's net margin of --. Nintendo's return on equity of 10.43% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

Nintendo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nintendo has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe Nintendo is more attractive than PicoCELA.

Nintendo has a beta of 0.624, which suggesting that the stock is 37.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nintendo has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nintendo pays 69.29% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nintendo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nintendo quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. Nintendo's net income of $842.7M is higher than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, Nintendo's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.68x while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nintendo is 13.07x versus 6.68x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 29.69% compared to Nintendo's net margin of --. Nintendo's return on equity of 10.43% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Nintendo has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nintendo has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Nintendo is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Nintendo has a beta of 0.624, which suggesting that the stock is 37.592% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nintendo has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.95%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nintendo pays 69.29% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nintendo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nintendo quarterly revenues are $2.8B, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Nintendo's net income of $842.7M is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Nintendo's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.68x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nintendo is 13.07x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.