IIJIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

KDDI has a net margin of 7.02% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of 12.29%. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92% beat KDDI's return on equity of 12.04%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KDDI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than KDDI, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than KDDI.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.959% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KDDI has a beta of 0.078, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.177%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. KDDI offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. KDDI pays out 41.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $574M, which are smaller than KDDI quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M is lower than KDDI's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.57x while KDDI's PE ratio is 14.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.48x versus 1.69x for KDDI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NTT has a net margin of 7.02% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of 8.55%. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92% beat NTT's return on equity of 8.87%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NTT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.12%. Given that NTT has higher upside potential than Internet Initiative Japan, analysts believe NTT is more attractive than Internet Initiative Japan.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.959% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NTT has a beta of 0.177, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.273%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. NTT offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. NTT pays out 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $574M, which are smaller than NTT quarterly revenues of $22.7B. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M is lower than NTT's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.57x while NTT's PE ratio is 12.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.48x versus 0.93x for NTT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PicoCELA has a net margin of 7.02% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of --. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92% beat PicoCELA's return on equity of --.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PicoCELA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than PicoCELA, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than PicoCELA.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.959% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PicoCELA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. PicoCELA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. PicoCELA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $574M, which are larger than PicoCELA quarterly revenues of --. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M is higher than PicoCELA's net income of --. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.57x while PicoCELA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.48x versus 6.68x for PicoCELA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TNL Mediagene has a net margin of 7.02% compared to Internet Initiative Japan's net margin of --. Internet Initiative Japan's return on equity of 14.92% beat TNL Mediagene's return on equity of --.

Internet Initiative Japan has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TNL Mediagene has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Internet Initiative Japan has higher upside potential than TNL Mediagene, analysts believe Internet Initiative Japan is more attractive than TNL Mediagene.

Internet Initiative Japan has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.959% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TNL Mediagene has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Internet Initiative Japan has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.37%. TNL Mediagene offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Internet Initiative Japan pays 30.77% of its earnings as a dividend. TNL Mediagene pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Internet Initiative Japan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Internet Initiative Japan quarterly revenues are $574M, which are larger than TNL Mediagene quarterly revenues of --. Internet Initiative Japan's net income of $40.3M is higher than TNL Mediagene's net income of --. Notably, Internet Initiative Japan's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.57x while TNL Mediagene's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Internet Initiative Japan is 1.48x versus -- for TNL Mediagene. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.