MZDAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Mazda Motor's net margin of --. Mazda Motor's return on equity of 6.33% beat Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09%.

Mazda Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mazda Motor has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, analysts believe Mazda Motor is more attractive than Linkage Global.

Mazda Motor has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mazda Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.55%. Linkage Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mazda Motor pays 33.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mazda Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mazda Motor quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Linkage Global quarterly revenues of --. Mazda Motor's net income of $362.2M is higher than Linkage Global's net income of --. Notably, Mazda Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.78x while Linkage Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mazda Motor is 0.11x versus 0.76x for Linkage Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Mazda Motor's net margin of --. Mazda Motor's return on equity of 6.33% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's return on equity of --.

Mazda Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 258.59%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has higher upside potential than Mazda Motor, analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies is more attractive than Mazda Motor.

Mazda Motor has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mazda Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.55%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mazda Motor pays 33.15% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mazda Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mazda Motor quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Mazda Motor's net income of $362.2M is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Mazda Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.78x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's PE ratio is 7.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mazda Motor is 0.11x versus 0.15x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NSK has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Mazda Motor's net margin of 0.99%. Mazda Motor's return on equity of 6.33% beat NSK's return on equity of 1.57%.

Mazda Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NSK has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mazda Motor has higher upside potential than NSK, analysts believe Mazda Motor is more attractive than NSK.

Mazda Motor has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NSK has a beta of 0.413, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.676%.

Mazda Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.55%. NSK offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Mazda Motor pays 33.15% of its earnings as a dividend. NSK pays out 146.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Mazda Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but NSK's is not.

Mazda Motor quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than NSK quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Mazda Motor's net income of $362.2M is higher than NSK's net income of $12.9M. Notably, Mazda Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.78x while NSK's PE ratio is 31.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mazda Motor is 0.11x versus 0.42x for NSK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle has a net margin of 4.26% compared to Mazda Motor's net margin of --. Mazda Motor's return on equity of 6.33% beat Tokyo Lifestyle's return on equity of -1.49%.

Mazda Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mazda Motor has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle, analysts believe Mazda Motor is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle.

Mazda Motor has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.168% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mazda Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.55%. Tokyo Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mazda Motor pays 33.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mazda Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mazda Motor quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle quarterly revenues of --. Mazda Motor's net income of $362.2M is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle's net income of --. Notably, Mazda Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.78x while Tokyo Lifestyle's PE ratio is 2.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mazda Motor is 0.11x versus 0.09x for Tokyo Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.