MMTOF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Linkage Global has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Mitsubishi Motors's net margin of --. Mitsubishi Motors's return on equity of 4.03% beat Linkage Global's return on equity of -42.09%.

Mitsubishi Motors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Linkage Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Motors has higher upside potential than Linkage Global, analysts believe Mitsubishi Motors is more attractive than Linkage Global.

Mitsubishi Motors has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.222% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Linkage Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Linkage Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi Motors pays 45.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Linkage Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Motors quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Linkage Global quarterly revenues of --. Mitsubishi Motors's net income of -$31M is higher than Linkage Global's net income of --. Notably, Mitsubishi Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Linkage Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Motors is 0.20x versus 0.76x for Linkage Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Mitsubishi Motors's net margin of --. Mitsubishi Motors's return on equity of 4.03% beat MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's return on equity of --.

Mitsubishi Motors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $4.98 which suggests that it could grow by 258.59%. Given that MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has higher upside potential than Mitsubishi Motors, analysts believe MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies is more attractive than Mitsubishi Motors.

Mitsubishi Motors has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.222% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi Motors pays 45.34% of its earnings as a dividend. MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Motors quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies quarterly revenues of --. Mitsubishi Motors's net income of -$31M is higher than MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's net income of --. Notably, Mitsubishi Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies's PE ratio is 7.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Motors is 0.20x versus 0.15x for MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tokyo Lifestyle has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Mitsubishi Motors's net margin of --. Mitsubishi Motors's return on equity of 4.03% beat Tokyo Lifestyle's return on equity of -1.49%.

Mitsubishi Motors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tokyo Lifestyle has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Motors has higher upside potential than Tokyo Lifestyle, analysts believe Mitsubishi Motors is more attractive than Tokyo Lifestyle.

Mitsubishi Motors has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.222% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tokyo Lifestyle has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mitsubishi Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Tokyo Lifestyle offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mitsubishi Motors pays 45.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Tokyo Lifestyle pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mitsubishi Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Motors quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are larger than Tokyo Lifestyle quarterly revenues of --. Mitsubishi Motors's net income of -$31M is higher than Tokyo Lifestyle's net income of --. Notably, Mitsubishi Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Tokyo Lifestyle's PE ratio is 2.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Motors is 0.20x versus 0.09x for Tokyo Lifestyle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toyota Motor has a net margin of -0.69% compared to Mitsubishi Motors's net margin of 5.38%. Mitsubishi Motors's return on equity of 4.03% beat Toyota Motor's return on equity of 13.1%.

Mitsubishi Motors has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Toyota Motor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mitsubishi Motors has higher upside potential than Toyota Motor, analysts believe Mitsubishi Motors is more attractive than Toyota Motor.

Mitsubishi Motors has a beta of 0.278, which suggesting that the stock is 72.222% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toyota Motor has a beta of 0.584, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.565%.

Mitsubishi Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.98%. Toyota Motor offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Mitsubishi Motors pays 45.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Toyota Motor pays out 23.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mitsubishi Motors quarterly revenues are $4.5B, which are smaller than Toyota Motor quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Mitsubishi Motors's net income of -$31M is lower than Toyota Motor's net income of $4.4B. Notably, Mitsubishi Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.24x while Toyota Motor's PE ratio is 7.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mitsubishi Motors is 0.20x versus 0.71x for Toyota Motor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.