KNOS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of -- compared to Kronos Advanced Technologies's net margin of 20.37%. Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of -- beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13536.36%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $34.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.34%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of 2.129, which suggesting that the stock is 112.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.81%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $176.7M. Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of -- is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $36M. Notably, Kronos Advanced Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 24.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Advanced Technologies is -- versus 1.90x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of -- compared to Kronos Advanced Technologies's net margin of 6.15%. Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Donaldson's return on equity of 24.08%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13536.36%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $72.35 which suggests that it could grow by 3.45%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Donaldson.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of 2.129, which suggesting that the stock is 112.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.548%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $940.1M. Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Donaldson's net income of $57.8M. Notably, Kronos Advanced Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Donaldson's PE ratio is 23.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Advanced Technologies is -- versus 2.33x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of -- compared to Kronos Advanced Technologies's net margin of -11.58%. Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13536.36%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.38%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Fuel Tech, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Fuel Tech.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of 2.129, which suggesting that the stock is 112.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 355.87%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $6.4M. Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K. Notably, Kronos Advanced Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Advanced Technologies is -- versus 3.07x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Kronos Advanced Technologies's net margin of 7.67%. Kronos Advanced Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13536.36%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $141.50 which suggests that it could fall by -1.35%. Given that Kronos Advanced Technologies has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Kronos Advanced Technologies is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a beta of 2.129, which suggesting that the stock is 112.946% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.187, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.681%.

Kronos Advanced Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kronos Advanced Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kronos Advanced Technologies quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Kronos Advanced Technologies's net income of -- is lower than Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Kronos Advanced Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 51.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kronos Advanced Technologies is -- versus 3.24x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.