LMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 20.37%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 18.77%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $141.50, signalling downside risk potential of -1.35%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $34.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.34%. Given that CECO Environmental has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe CECO Environmental is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.187, which suggesting that the stock is 18.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.81%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $176.7M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than CECO Environmental's net income of $36M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.41x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 24.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 3.24x versus 1.90x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 6.15%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 24.08%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $141.50, signalling downside risk potential of -1.35%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $72.35 which suggests that it could grow by 3.45%. Given that Donaldson has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Donaldson is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.187, which suggesting that the stock is 18.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.548%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $940.1M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $57.8M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.41x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 23.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 3.24x versus 2.33x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of -11.58%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -6.9%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $141.50, signalling downside risk potential of -1.35%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.38%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.187, which suggesting that the stock is 18.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.559, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 355.87%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $6.4M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of -$739K. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.41x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 3.24x versus 3.07x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 7.67% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 11.22%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 117.97%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of $141.50, signalling downside risk potential of -1.35%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of $575.50 which suggests that it could fall by -3.63%. Given that Lennox International has more downside risk than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Lennox International.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.187, which suggesting that the stock is 18.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.126, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.568%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 19.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.1M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $120.3M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 51.41x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 26.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 3.24x versus 3.98x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.