GWLLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BYD has a net margin of 4.38% compared to Great Wall Motor's net margin of 5.37%. Great Wall Motor's return on equity of 11.69% beat BYD's return on equity of 24.28%.

Great Wall Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand BYD has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Great Wall Motor has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe Great Wall Motor is more attractive than BYD.

Great Wall Motor has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.412% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BYD has a beta of 0.088, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 91.177%.

Great Wall Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. BYD offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Great Wall Motor pays 26.36% of its earnings as a dividend. BYD pays out 23.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Wall Motor quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are smaller than BYD quarterly revenues of $23.4B. Great Wall Motor's net income of $240.7M is lower than BYD's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Great Wall Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while BYD's PE ratio is 21.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Wall Motor is 0.54x versus 1.19x for BYD. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Li Auto has a net margin of 4.38% compared to Great Wall Motor's net margin of 2.51%. Great Wall Motor's return on equity of 11.69% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 12.05%.

Great Wall Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $33.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.94%. Given that Li Auto has higher upside potential than Great Wall Motor, analysts believe Li Auto is more attractive than Great Wall Motor.

Great Wall Motor has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.412% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Great Wall Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Wall Motor pays 26.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Wall Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Wall Motor quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Great Wall Motor's net income of $240.7M is higher than Li Auto's net income of $89.4M. Notably, Great Wall Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while Li Auto's PE ratio is 27.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Wall Motor is 0.54x versus 1.56x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 4.38% compared to Great Wall Motor's net margin of -57.26%. Great Wall Motor's return on equity of 11.69% beat NIO's return on equity of -161.56%.

Great Wall Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $4.74 which suggests that it could grow by 15.24%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Great Wall Motor, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Great Wall Motor.

Great Wall Motor has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.412% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.546, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.551%.

Great Wall Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Wall Motor pays 26.36% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Wall Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Wall Motor quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Great Wall Motor's net income of $240.7M is higher than NIO's net income of -$947.2M. Notably, Great Wall Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Wall Motor is 0.54x versus 0.90x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 4.38% compared to Great Wall Motor's net margin of -4.2%. Great Wall Motor's return on equity of 11.69% beat XPeng's return on equity of -15.58%.

Great Wall Motor has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $25.74 which suggests that it could grow by 43.58%. Given that XPeng has higher upside potential than Great Wall Motor, analysts believe XPeng is more attractive than Great Wall Motor.

Great Wall Motor has a beta of 0.426, which suggesting that the stock is 57.412% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Great Wall Motor has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.87%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Great Wall Motor pays 26.36% of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Great Wall Motor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Great Wall Motor quarterly revenues are $5.5B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Great Wall Motor's net income of $240.7M is higher than XPeng's net income of -$91.3M. Notably, Great Wall Motor's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.55x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Great Wall Motor is 0.54x versus 2.44x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.