NIO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of -57.26% compared to NIO's net margin of 2.51%. NIO's return on equity of -161.56% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 12.05%.

NIO has a consensus price target of $4.74, signalling upside risk potential of 15.24%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $33.50 which suggests that it could grow by 13.94%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Li Auto, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Li Auto.

NIO has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.551% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $3.6B. NIO's net income of -$947.2M is lower than Li Auto's net income of $89.4M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto's PE ratio is 27.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 0.90x versus 1.56x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -57.26% compared to NIO's net margin of 2.12%. NIO's return on equity of -161.56% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

NIO has a consensus price target of $4.74, signalling upside risk potential of 15.24%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -5.44%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Tesla.

NIO has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.551% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. NIO's net income of -$947.2M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 0.90x versus 11.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of -57.26% compared to NIO's net margin of -4.2%. NIO's return on equity of -161.56% beat XPeng's return on equity of -15.58%.

NIO has a consensus price target of $4.74, signalling upside risk potential of 15.24%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $25.74 which suggests that it could grow by 43.58%. Given that XPeng has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe XPeng is more attractive than NIO.

NIO has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.551% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than XPeng quarterly revenues of $2.2B. NIO's net income of -$947.2M is lower than XPeng's net income of -$91.3M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 0.90x versus 2.44x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a net margin of -57.26% compared to NIO's net margin of -3.26%. NIO's return on equity of -161.56% beat ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's return on equity of --.

NIO has a consensus price target of $4.74, signalling upside risk potential of 15.24%. On the other hand ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of $39.06 which suggests that it could grow by 31.18%. Given that ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has higher upside potential than NIO, analysts believe ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding is more attractive than NIO.

NIO has a beta of 1.546, which suggesting that the stock is 54.551% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

NIO has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. NIO pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

NIO quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding quarterly revenues of $3B. NIO's net income of -$947.2M is lower than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's net income of -$98.7M. Notably, NIO's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for NIO is 0.90x versus 0.64x for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.