GNZUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Geely Automobile Holdings has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group's net margin of 7.82%. Guangzhou Automobile Group's return on equity of -0.92% beat Geely Automobile Holdings's return on equity of 18.3%.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Geely Automobile Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guangzhou Automobile Group has higher upside potential than Geely Automobile Holdings, analysts believe Guangzhou Automobile Group is more attractive than Geely Automobile Holdings.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.208% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Geely Automobile Holdings has a beta of 0.950, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.989%.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Geely Automobile Holdings offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group pays 287.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Geely Automobile Holdings pays out 12.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Geely Automobile Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Guangzhou Automobile Group's is not.

Guangzhou Automobile Group quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Geely Automobile Holdings quarterly revenues of $10B. Guangzhou Automobile Group's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Geely Automobile Holdings's net income of $779.7M. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while Geely Automobile Holdings's PE ratio is 10.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group is 0.32x versus 0.75x for Geely Automobile Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NFT has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group's net margin of --. Guangzhou Automobile Group's return on equity of -0.92% beat NFT's return on equity of --.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NFT has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guangzhou Automobile Group has higher upside potential than NFT, analysts believe Guangzhou Automobile Group is more attractive than NFT.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.208% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NFT has a beta of 3.596, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 259.58%.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. NFT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group pays 287.08% of its earnings as a dividend. NFT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Guangzhou Automobile Group quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than NFT quarterly revenues of --. Guangzhou Automobile Group's net income of -$100.6M is higher than NFT's net income of --. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while NFT's PE ratio is 0.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group is 0.32x versus 14.41x for NFT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group's net margin of 2.64%. Guangzhou Automobile Group's return on equity of -0.92% beat Melco Resorts and Entertainment's return on equity of --.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Melco Resorts and Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $8.99 which suggests that it could grow by 1.99%. Given that Melco Resorts and Entertainment has higher upside potential than Guangzhou Automobile Group, analysts believe Melco Resorts and Entertainment is more attractive than Guangzhou Automobile Group.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.208% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Melco Resorts and Entertainment has a beta of 0.825, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.541%.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Melco Resorts and Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group pays 287.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment pays out 0.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Melco Resorts and Entertainment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Guangzhou Automobile Group's is not.

Guangzhou Automobile Group quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Melco Resorts and Entertainment quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Guangzhou Automobile Group's net income of -$100.6M is lower than Melco Resorts and Entertainment's net income of $32.5M. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while Melco Resorts and Entertainment's PE ratio is 62.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group is 0.32x versus 0.79x for Melco Resorts and Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oriental Culture Holding has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Guangzhou Automobile Group's net margin of --. Guangzhou Automobile Group's return on equity of -0.92% beat Oriental Culture Holding's return on equity of -6.99%.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Oriental Culture Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Guangzhou Automobile Group has higher upside potential than Oriental Culture Holding, analysts believe Guangzhou Automobile Group is more attractive than Oriental Culture Holding.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a beta of 0.138, which suggesting that the stock is 86.208% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oriental Culture Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Guangzhou Automobile Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.8%. Oriental Culture Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Guangzhou Automobile Group pays 287.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Oriental Culture Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Guangzhou Automobile Group quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Oriental Culture Holding quarterly revenues of --. Guangzhou Automobile Group's net income of -$100.6M is higher than Oriental Culture Holding's net income of --. Notably, Guangzhou Automobile Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.77x while Oriental Culture Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Guangzhou Automobile Group is 0.32x versus 110.45x for Oriental Culture Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.