EHVVF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AMPD Ventures has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of --. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat AMPD Ventures's return on equity of --.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand AMPD Ventures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ehave has higher upside potential than AMPD Ventures, analysts believe Ehave is more attractive than AMPD Ventures.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMPD Ventures has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AMPD Ventures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AMPD Ventures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than AMPD Ventures quarterly revenues of --. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than AMPD Ventures's net income of --. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while AMPD Ventures's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 0.16x for AMPD Ventures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Destiny Media Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -6.38%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat Destiny Media Technologies's return on equity of -13.05%.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Destiny Media Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ehave has higher upside potential than Destiny Media Technologies, analysts believe Ehave is more attractive than Destiny Media Technologies.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Destiny Media Technologies has a beta of 0.772, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.85%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Destiny Media Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Destiny Media Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Destiny Media Technologies quarterly revenues of $1.1M. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than Destiny Media Technologies's net income of -$72.3K. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Destiny Media Technologies's PE ratio is 88.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 1.21x for Destiny Media Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -4.72%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat Inuvo's return on equity of -36.12%.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $13.50 which suggests that it could grow by 160.62%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Ehave.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.534, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.432%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.7M. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than Inuvo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 0.78x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LeddarTech Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Ehave's net margin of -6680.99%. Ehave's return on equity of -- beat LeddarTech Holdings's return on equity of --.

Ehave has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand LeddarTech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5469.61%. Given that LeddarTech Holdings has higher upside potential than Ehave, analysts believe LeddarTech Holdings is more attractive than Ehave.

Ehave has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LeddarTech Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Ehave has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LeddarTech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ehave pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LeddarTech Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ehave quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than LeddarTech Holdings quarterly revenues of $166.1K. Ehave's net income of -- is lower than LeddarTech Holdings's net income of -$11.1M. Notably, Ehave's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while LeddarTech Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ehave is -- versus 1.38x for LeddarTech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.