CVHL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

California First Leasing has a net margin of -- compared to CV Holdings's net margin of --. CV Holdings's return on equity of -- beat California First Leasing's return on equity of 13.72%.

CV Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27422.94%. On the other hand California First Leasing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CV Holdings has higher upside potential than California First Leasing, analysts believe CV Holdings is more attractive than California First Leasing.

CV Holdings has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.925% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison California First Leasing has a beta of 0.102, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.82%.

CV Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. California First Leasing offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. CV Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing pays out 11.09% of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CV Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than California First Leasing quarterly revenues of --. CV Holdings's net income of -- is lower than California First Leasing's net income of --. Notably, CV Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while California First Leasing's PE ratio is 5.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CV Holdings is -- versus 3.96x for California First Leasing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Income Opportunity Realty Investors has a net margin of -- compared to CV Holdings's net margin of 73.42%. CV Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Income Opportunity Realty Investors's return on equity of 3.69%.

CV Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27422.94%. On the other hand Income Opportunity Realty Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that CV Holdings has higher upside potential than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, analysts believe CV Holdings is more attractive than Income Opportunity Realty Investors.

CV Holdings has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.925% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Income Opportunity Realty Investors has a beta of 0.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.64%.

CV Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Income Opportunity Realty Investors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CV Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Income Opportunity Realty Investors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

CV Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Income Opportunity Realty Investors quarterly revenues of $1.3M. CV Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Income Opportunity Realty Investors's net income of $989K. Notably, CV Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Income Opportunity Realty Investors's PE ratio is 17.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CV Holdings is -- versus 12.71x for Income Opportunity Realty Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of -- compared to CV Holdings's net margin of 32.4%. CV Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

CV Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27422.94%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that CV Holdings has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe CV Holdings is more attractive than Park National.

CV Holdings has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.925% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

CV Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. CV Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CV Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. CV Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, CV Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CV Holdings is -- versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransUnion has a net margin of -- compared to CV Holdings's net margin of 13.52%. CV Holdings's return on equity of -- beat TransUnion's return on equity of 8.52%.

CV Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 27422.94%. On the other hand TransUnion has an analysts' consensus of $108.84 which suggests that it could grow by 19.18%. Given that CV Holdings has higher upside potential than TransUnion, analysts believe CV Holdings is more attractive than TransUnion.

CV Holdings has a beta of 0.941, which suggesting that the stock is 5.925% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransUnion has a beta of 1.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.362%.

CV Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransUnion offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. CV Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TransUnion pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. TransUnion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CV Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TransUnion quarterly revenues of $1.1B. CV Holdings's net income of -- is lower than TransUnion's net income of $148.1M. Notably, CV Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while TransUnion's PE ratio is 48.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CV Holdings is -- versus 4.22x for TransUnion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.