CFNB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CV Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing's net margin of --. California First Leasing's return on equity of 13.72% beat CV Holdings's return on equity of --.

California First Leasing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CV Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27422.94%. Given that CV Holdings has higher upside potential than California First Leasing, analysts believe CV Holdings is more attractive than California First Leasing.

California First Leasing has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CV Holdings has a beta of 0.941, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.925%.

California First Leasing has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CV Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California First Leasing pays 11.09% of its earnings as a dividend. CV Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California First Leasing quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CV Holdings quarterly revenues of --. California First Leasing's net income of -- is lower than CV Holdings's net income of --. Notably, California First Leasing's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.36x while CV Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing is 3.87x versus -- for CV Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Income Opportunity Realty Investors has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing's net margin of 73.42%. California First Leasing's return on equity of 13.72% beat Income Opportunity Realty Investors's return on equity of 3.69%.

California First Leasing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Income Opportunity Realty Investors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that California First Leasing has higher upside potential than Income Opportunity Realty Investors, analysts believe California First Leasing is more attractive than Income Opportunity Realty Investors.

California First Leasing has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Income Opportunity Realty Investors has a beta of 0.064, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.64%.

California First Leasing has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Income Opportunity Realty Investors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. California First Leasing pays 11.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Income Opportunity Realty Investors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. California First Leasing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California First Leasing quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Income Opportunity Realty Investors quarterly revenues of $1.3M. California First Leasing's net income of -- is lower than Income Opportunity Realty Investors's net income of $989K. Notably, California First Leasing's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.36x while Income Opportunity Realty Investors's PE ratio is 17.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing is 3.87x versus 12.45x for Income Opportunity Realty Investors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing's net margin of 32.4%. California First Leasing's return on equity of 13.72% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

California First Leasing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $172.67 which suggests that it could grow by 1.08%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than California First Leasing, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than California First Leasing.

California First Leasing has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.821, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.866%.

California First Leasing has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. California First Leasing pays 11.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California First Leasing quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. California First Leasing's net income of -- is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, California First Leasing's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.36x while Park National's PE ratio is 17.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing is 3.87x versus 5.25x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransUnion has a net margin of -- compared to California First Leasing's net margin of 13.52%. California First Leasing's return on equity of 13.72% beat TransUnion's return on equity of 8.52%.

California First Leasing has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand TransUnion has an analysts' consensus of $108.84 which suggests that it could grow by 19.18%. Given that TransUnion has higher upside potential than California First Leasing, analysts believe TransUnion is more attractive than California First Leasing.

California First Leasing has a beta of 0.102, which suggesting that the stock is 89.82% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransUnion has a beta of 1.634, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.362%.

California First Leasing has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TransUnion offers a yield of 0.48% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. California First Leasing pays 11.09% of its earnings as a dividend. TransUnion pays out 29.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

California First Leasing quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than TransUnion quarterly revenues of $1.1B. California First Leasing's net income of -- is lower than TransUnion's net income of $148.1M. Notably, California First Leasing's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.36x while TransUnion's PE ratio is 48.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for California First Leasing is 3.87x versus 4.22x for TransUnion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.