VTLE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Devon Energy has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 11.1%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat Devon Energy's return on equity of 20.2%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 28.29%. On the other hand Devon Energy has an analysts' consensus of $43.94 which suggests that it could grow by 38.38%. Given that Devon Energy has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe Devon Energy is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 1.597, which suggesting that the stock is 59.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Devon Energy has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.867%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Devon Energy offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy pays out 32.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Devon Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than Devon Energy quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Devon Energy's net income of $494M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Devon Energy's PE ratio is 7.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.31x versus 1.20x for Devon Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 34.86%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 12.66%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 28.29%. On the other hand Diamondback Energy has an analysts' consensus of $182.20 which suggests that it could grow by 33.51%. Given that Diamondback Energy has higher upside potential than Vital Energy, analysts believe Diamondback Energy is more attractive than Vital Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 1.597, which suggesting that the stock is 59.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.051, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.052%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Diamondback Energy offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamondback Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are smaller than Diamondback Energy quarterly revenues of $4B. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Diamondback Energy's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Diamondback Energy's PE ratio is 8.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.31x versus 2.57x for Diamondback Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Houston American Energy has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of -1008.83%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -112.52%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 28.29%. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 1.597, which suggesting that the stock is 59.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.608%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $102.4K. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Houston American Energy's net income of -$1M. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.31x versus 25.52x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mexco Energy has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Vital Energy's net margin of 24.81%. Vital Energy's return on equity of -4.49% beat Mexco Energy's return on equity of 7.6%.

Vital Energy has a consensus price target of $20.67, signalling upside risk potential of 28.29%. On the other hand Mexco Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vital Energy has higher upside potential than Mexco Energy, analysts believe Vital Energy is more attractive than Mexco Energy.

Vital Energy has a beta of 1.597, which suggesting that the stock is 59.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mexco Energy has a beta of 0.405, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.526%.

Vital Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mexco Energy offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Vital Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy pays out 12.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Mexco Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vital Energy quarterly revenues are $512.2M, which are larger than Mexco Energy quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Vital Energy's net income of -$18.8M is lower than Mexco Energy's net income of $469.1K. Notably, Vital Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.46x while Mexco Energy's PE ratio is 9.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vital Energy is 0.31x versus 2.25x for Mexco Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.