UMH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Extra Space Storage has a net margin of 7.94% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of 33.03%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.38% beat Extra Space Storage's return on equity of 6.08%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.21, signalling upside risk potential of 25.45%. On the other hand Extra Space Storage has an analysts' consensus of $163.10 which suggests that it could grow by 10.75%. Given that UMH Properties has higher upside potential than Extra Space Storage, analysts believe UMH Properties is more attractive than Extra Space Storage.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Extra Space Storage has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.624%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.15%. Extra Space Storage offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. UMH Properties pays 361.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Extra Space Storage pays out 160.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $61.2M, which are smaller than Extra Space Storage quarterly revenues of $820M. UMH Properties's net income of $4.9M is lower than Extra Space Storage's net income of $270.9M. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.92x while Extra Space Storage's PE ratio is 34.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.41x versus 9.61x for Extra Space Storage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Concept Energy has a net margin of 7.94% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of -52.63%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.38% beat New Concept Energy's return on equity of -0.88%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.21, signalling upside risk potential of 25.45%. On the other hand New Concept Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that UMH Properties has higher upside potential than New Concept Energy, analysts believe UMH Properties is more attractive than New Concept Energy.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Concept Energy has a beta of 0.032, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 96.81%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.15%. New Concept Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. UMH Properties pays 361.63% of its earnings as a dividend. New Concept Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $61.2M, which are larger than New Concept Energy quarterly revenues of $38K. UMH Properties's net income of $4.9M is higher than New Concept Energy's net income of -$20K. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.92x while New Concept Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.41x versus 33.29x for New Concept Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Global Net Lease has a net margin of 7.94% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of -143.02%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.38% beat Global Net Lease's return on equity of -13.12%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.21, signalling upside risk potential of 25.45%. On the other hand Global Net Lease has an analysts' consensus of $9.42 which suggests that it could grow by 31.33%. Given that Global Net Lease has higher upside potential than UMH Properties, analysts believe Global Net Lease is more attractive than UMH Properties.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.432%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.15%. Global Net Lease offers a yield of 12.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. UMH Properties pays 361.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Net Lease pays out -240.31% of its earnings as a dividend.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $61.2M, which are smaller than Global Net Lease quarterly revenues of $132.4M. UMH Properties's net income of $4.9M is higher than Global Net Lease's net income of -$189.4M. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.92x while Global Net Lease's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.41x versus 2.26x for Global Net Lease. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LTC Properties has a net margin of 7.94% compared to UMH Properties's net margin of 42.18%. UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.38% beat LTC Properties's return on equity of 8.67%.

UMH Properties has a consensus price target of $21.21, signalling upside risk potential of 25.45%. On the other hand LTC Properties has an analysts' consensus of $36.83 which suggests that it could grow by 5.69%. Given that UMH Properties has higher upside potential than LTC Properties, analysts believe UMH Properties is more attractive than LTC Properties.

UMH Properties has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LTC Properties has a beta of 0.648, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.215%.

UMH Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.15%. LTC Properties offers a yield of 6.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. UMH Properties pays 361.63% of its earnings as a dividend. LTC Properties pays out 110.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

UMH Properties quarterly revenues are $61.2M, which are larger than LTC Properties quarterly revenues of $49M. UMH Properties's net income of $4.9M is lower than LTC Properties's net income of $20.7M. Notably, UMH Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 140.92x while LTC Properties's PE ratio is 17.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for UMH Properties is 5.41x versus 7.51x for LTC Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.