LTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Global Net Lease has a net margin of 42.18% compared to LTC Properties's net margin of -143.02%. LTC Properties's return on equity of 8.67% beat Global Net Lease's return on equity of -13.12%.

LTC Properties has a consensus price target of $36.83, signalling upside risk potential of 4.37%. On the other hand Global Net Lease has an analysts' consensus of $9.42 which suggests that it could grow by 30.79%. Given that Global Net Lease has higher upside potential than LTC Properties, analysts believe Global Net Lease is more attractive than LTC Properties.

LTC Properties has a beta of 0.648, which suggesting that the stock is 35.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.204, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.432%.

LTC Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Global Net Lease offers a yield of 12.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. LTC Properties pays 110.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Net Lease pays out -240.31% of its earnings as a dividend.

LTC Properties quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Global Net Lease quarterly revenues of $132.4M. LTC Properties's net income of $20.7M is higher than Global Net Lease's net income of -$189.4M. Notably, LTC Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while Global Net Lease's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LTC Properties is 7.61x versus 2.27x for Global Net Lease. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sabra Health Care REIT has a net margin of 42.18% compared to LTC Properties's net margin of 21.96%. LTC Properties's return on equity of 8.67% beat Sabra Health Care REIT's return on equity of 5.13%.

LTC Properties has a consensus price target of $36.83, signalling upside risk potential of 4.37%. On the other hand Sabra Health Care REIT has an analysts' consensus of $19.82 which suggests that it could grow by 8.53%. Given that Sabra Health Care REIT has higher upside potential than LTC Properties, analysts believe Sabra Health Care REIT is more attractive than LTC Properties.

LTC Properties has a beta of 0.648, which suggesting that the stock is 35.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sabra Health Care REIT has a beta of 0.855, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.52%.

LTC Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Sabra Health Care REIT offers a yield of 6.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. LTC Properties pays 110.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Sabra Health Care REIT pays out 221.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LTC Properties quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Sabra Health Care REIT quarterly revenues of $183.5M. LTC Properties's net income of $20.7M is lower than Sabra Health Care REIT's net income of $40.3M. Notably, LTC Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while Sabra Health Care REIT's PE ratio is 30.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LTC Properties is 7.61x versus 6.03x for Sabra Health Care REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Starwood Property Trust has a net margin of 42.18% compared to LTC Properties's net margin of 61.25%. LTC Properties's return on equity of 8.67% beat Starwood Property Trust's return on equity of 4.46%.

LTC Properties has a consensus price target of $36.83, signalling upside risk potential of 4.37%. On the other hand Starwood Property Trust has an analysts' consensus of $21.92 which suggests that it could grow by 3.8%. Given that LTC Properties has higher upside potential than Starwood Property Trust, analysts believe LTC Properties is more attractive than Starwood Property Trust.

LTC Properties has a beta of 0.648, which suggesting that the stock is 35.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Starwood Property Trust has a beta of 1.242, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.217%.

LTC Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. Starwood Property Trust offers a yield of 9.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. LTC Properties pays 110.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Starwood Property Trust pays out 172.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LTC Properties quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than Starwood Property Trust quarterly revenues of $183.3M. LTC Properties's net income of $20.7M is lower than Starwood Property Trust's net income of $112.3M. Notably, LTC Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while Starwood Property Trust's PE ratio is 22.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LTC Properties is 7.61x versus 8.06x for Starwood Property Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UMH Properties has a net margin of 42.18% compared to LTC Properties's net margin of 7.94%. LTC Properties's return on equity of 8.67% beat UMH Properties's return on equity of 3.38%.

LTC Properties has a consensus price target of $36.83, signalling upside risk potential of 4.37%. On the other hand UMH Properties has an analysts' consensus of $21.21 which suggests that it could grow by 25.38%. Given that UMH Properties has higher upside potential than LTC Properties, analysts believe UMH Properties is more attractive than LTC Properties.

LTC Properties has a beta of 0.648, which suggesting that the stock is 35.215% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UMH Properties has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.143%.

LTC Properties has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.46%. UMH Properties offers a yield of 5.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. LTC Properties pays 110.42% of its earnings as a dividend. UMH Properties pays out 361.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LTC Properties quarterly revenues are $49M, which are smaller than UMH Properties quarterly revenues of $61.2M. LTC Properties's net income of $20.7M is higher than UMH Properties's net income of $4.9M. Notably, LTC Properties's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.19x while UMH Properties's PE ratio is 141.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LTC Properties is 7.61x versus 5.42x for UMH Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.