TRN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 7.13%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.53% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 14.11%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of $53.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.91%. Given that Greenbrier Companies has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe Greenbrier Companies is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.455, which suggesting that the stock is 45.463% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.708, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.796%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 2.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $585.4M, which are smaller than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $842.7M. Trinity Industries's net income of $22.1M is lower than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $60.1M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.47x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 7.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.79x versus 0.46x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

FreightCar America has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 52.39%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.53% beat FreightCar America's return on equity of --.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand FreightCar America has an analysts' consensus of $11.83 which suggests that it could grow by 4.08%. Given that FreightCar America has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe FreightCar America is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.455, which suggesting that the stock is 45.463% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FreightCar America has a beta of 1.888, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.841%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. FreightCar America offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. FreightCar America pays out -36.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Trinity Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $585.4M, which are larger than FreightCar America quarterly revenues of $96.3M. Trinity Industries's net income of $22.1M is lower than FreightCar America's net income of $50.4M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.47x while FreightCar America's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.79x versus 0.74x for FreightCar America. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RXO has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of -2.16%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.53% beat RXO's return on equity of -25.45%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand RXO has an analysts' consensus of $16.57 which suggests that it could grow by 2.51%. Given that Trinity Industries has higher upside potential than RXO, analysts believe Trinity Industries is more attractive than RXO.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.455, which suggesting that the stock is 45.463% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RXO has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. RXO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. RXO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trinity Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $585.4M, which are smaller than RXO quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Trinity Industries's net income of $22.1M is higher than RXO's net income of -$31M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.47x while RXO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.79x versus 0.47x for RXO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 3.78% compared to Trinity Industries's net margin of 12.34%. Trinity Industries's return on equity of 10.53% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.66%.

Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $27.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.07%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $223.11 which suggests that it could grow by 5.47%. Given that Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has higher upside potential than Trinity Industries, analysts believe Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies is more attractive than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.455, which suggesting that the stock is 45.463% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.926%.

Trinity Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.42%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Trinity Industries pays 67.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Trinity Industries quarterly revenues are $585.4M, which are smaller than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Trinity Industries's net income of $22.1M is lower than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $322M. Notably, Trinity Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.47x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 33.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Trinity Industries is 0.79x versus 3.49x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.