TPB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ispire Technology has a net margin of 13.53% compared to Turning Point Brands's net margin of -41.45%. Turning Point Brands's return on equity of 23.04% beat Ispire Technology's return on equity of -99.95%.

Turning Point Brands has a consensus price target of $90.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.64%. On the other hand Ispire Technology has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 154.24%. Given that Ispire Technology has higher upside potential than Turning Point Brands, analysts believe Ispire Technology is more attractive than Turning Point Brands.

Turning Point Brands has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.259% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ispire Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Turning Point Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Ispire Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Turning Point Brands pays 12.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Ispire Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Turning Point Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Turning Point Brands quarterly revenues are $106.4M, which are larger than Ispire Technology quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Turning Point Brands's net income of $14.4M is higher than Ispire Technology's net income of -$10.9M. Notably, Turning Point Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.93x while Ispire Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Turning Point Brands is 4.06x versus 1.16x for Ispire Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a net margin of 13.53% compared to Turning Point Brands's net margin of -4246.26%. Turning Point Brands's return on equity of 23.04% beat Kaival Brands Innovations Group's return on equity of -75.36%.

Turning Point Brands has a consensus price target of $90.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.64%. On the other hand Kaival Brands Innovations Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 867.12%. Given that Kaival Brands Innovations Group has higher upside potential than Turning Point Brands, analysts believe Kaival Brands Innovations Group is more attractive than Turning Point Brands.

Turning Point Brands has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.259% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a beta of -0.159, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.936%.

Turning Point Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Kaival Brands Innovations Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Turning Point Brands pays 12.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaival Brands Innovations Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Turning Point Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Turning Point Brands quarterly revenues are $106.4M, which are larger than Kaival Brands Innovations Group quarterly revenues of $47.1K. Turning Point Brands's net income of $14.4M is higher than Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net income of -$2M. Notably, Turning Point Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.93x while Kaival Brands Innovations Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Turning Point Brands is 4.06x versus 2.59x for Kaival Brands Innovations Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Altria Group has a net margin of 13.53% compared to Turning Point Brands's net margin of 23.83%. Turning Point Brands's return on equity of 23.04% beat Altria Group's return on equity of --.

Turning Point Brands has a consensus price target of $90.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.64%. On the other hand Altria Group has an analysts' consensus of $58.55 which suggests that it could fall by -0.53%. Given that Turning Point Brands has higher upside potential than Altria Group, analysts believe Turning Point Brands is more attractive than Altria Group.

Turning Point Brands has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.259% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altria Group has a beta of 0.592, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.775%.

Turning Point Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Altria Group offers a yield of 6.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Turning Point Brands pays 12.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group pays out 60.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Turning Point Brands quarterly revenues are $106.4M, which are smaller than Altria Group quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Turning Point Brands's net income of $14.4M is lower than Altria Group's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Turning Point Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.93x while Altria Group's PE ratio is 9.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Turning Point Brands is 4.06x versus 4.95x for Altria Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Philip Morris International has a net margin of 13.53% compared to Turning Point Brands's net margin of 28.92%. Turning Point Brands's return on equity of 23.04% beat Philip Morris International's return on equity of --.

Turning Point Brands has a consensus price target of $90.50, signalling upside risk potential of 13.64%. On the other hand Philip Morris International has an analysts' consensus of $183.73 which suggests that it could grow by 0.25%. Given that Turning Point Brands has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Turning Point Brands is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Turning Point Brands has a beta of 0.747, which suggesting that the stock is 25.259% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.512, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.835%.

Turning Point Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.36%. Philip Morris International offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Turning Point Brands pays 12.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Philip Morris International pays out 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Turning Point Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Turning Point Brands quarterly revenues are $106.4M, which are smaller than Philip Morris International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Turning Point Brands's net income of $14.4M is lower than Philip Morris International's net income of $2.7B. Notably, Turning Point Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.93x while Philip Morris International's PE ratio is 37.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Turning Point Brands is 4.06x versus 7.43x for Philip Morris International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.