KAVL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ispire Technology has a net margin of -4246.26% compared to Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net margin of -41.45%. Kaival Brands Innovations Group's return on equity of -75.36% beat Ispire Technology's return on equity of -99.95%.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 867.12%. On the other hand Ispire Technology has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 156.85%. Given that Kaival Brands Innovations Group has higher upside potential than Ispire Technology, analysts believe Kaival Brands Innovations Group is more attractive than Ispire Technology.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a beta of -0.159, which suggesting that the stock is 115.936% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ispire Technology has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ispire Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaival Brands Innovations Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ispire Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group quarterly revenues are $47.1K, which are smaller than Ispire Technology quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net income of -$2M is higher than Ispire Technology's net income of -$10.9M. Notably, Kaival Brands Innovations Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ispire Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaival Brands Innovations Group is 2.59x versus 1.14x for Ispire Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Altria Group has a net margin of -4246.26% compared to Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net margin of 23.83%. Kaival Brands Innovations Group's return on equity of -75.36% beat Altria Group's return on equity of --.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 867.12%. On the other hand Altria Group has an analysts' consensus of $58.55 which suggests that it could fall by -0.53%. Given that Kaival Brands Innovations Group has higher upside potential than Altria Group, analysts believe Kaival Brands Innovations Group is more attractive than Altria Group.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a beta of -0.159, which suggesting that the stock is 115.936% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altria Group has a beta of 0.592, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.775%.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Altria Group offers a yield of 6.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Kaival Brands Innovations Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group pays out 60.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group quarterly revenues are $47.1K, which are smaller than Altria Group quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net income of -$2M is lower than Altria Group's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Kaival Brands Innovations Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Altria Group's PE ratio is 9.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaival Brands Innovations Group is 2.59x versus 4.95x for Altria Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Philip Morris International has a net margin of -4246.26% compared to Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net margin of 28.92%. Kaival Brands Innovations Group's return on equity of -75.36% beat Philip Morris International's return on equity of --.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 867.12%. On the other hand Philip Morris International has an analysts' consensus of $183.73 which suggests that it could grow by 0.25%. Given that Kaival Brands Innovations Group has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Kaival Brands Innovations Group is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a beta of -0.159, which suggesting that the stock is 115.936% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.512, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.835%.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Philip Morris International offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Kaival Brands Innovations Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Philip Morris International pays out 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group quarterly revenues are $47.1K, which are smaller than Philip Morris International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net income of -$2M is lower than Philip Morris International's net income of $2.7B. Notably, Kaival Brands Innovations Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Philip Morris International's PE ratio is 37.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaival Brands Innovations Group is 2.59x versus 7.43x for Philip Morris International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of -4246.26% compared to Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net margin of 0.13%. Kaival Brands Innovations Group's return on equity of -75.36% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 867.12%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $81.14 which suggests that it could grow by 47.45%. Given that Kaival Brands Innovations Group has higher upside potential than Spectrum Brands Holdings, analysts believe Kaival Brands Innovations Group is more attractive than Spectrum Brands Holdings.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a beta of -0.159, which suggesting that the stock is 115.936% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.074%.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Kaival Brands Innovations Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kaival Brands Innovations Group quarterly revenues are $47.1K, which are smaller than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. Kaival Brands Innovations Group's net income of -$2M is lower than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, Kaival Brands Innovations Group's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 26.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaival Brands Innovations Group is 2.59x versus 0.52x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.