SQNS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

AXT has a net margin of -90.07% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of -45.45%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of 240.01% beat AXT's return on equity of -7.08%.

Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 94.3%. On the other hand AXT has an analysts' consensus of $3.96 which suggests that it could grow by 65.69%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than AXT, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than AXT.

Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AXT has a beta of 2.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.197%.

Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AXT offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AXT pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are smaller than AXT quarterly revenues of $19.4M. Sequans Communications SA's net income of -$7.3M is higher than AXT's net income of -$8.8M. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.68x while AXT's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 2.69x versus 1.08x for AXT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GSI Technology has a net margin of -90.07% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of -37.91%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of 240.01% beat GSI Technology's return on equity of -32.16%.

Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 94.3%. On the other hand GSI Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than GSI Technology, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than GSI Technology.

Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GSI Technology has a beta of 1.114, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.441%.

Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. GSI Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. GSI Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are larger than GSI Technology quarterly revenues of $5.9M. Sequans Communications SA's net income of -$7.3M is lower than GSI Technology's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.68x while GSI Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 2.69x versus 6.38x for GSI Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of -90.07% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of -8.74%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of 240.01% beat inTest's return on equity of -0.1%.

Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 94.3%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $10.50 which suggests that it could grow by 48.94%. Given that Sequans Communications SA has higher upside potential than inTest, analysts believe Sequans Communications SA is more attractive than inTest.

Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.655, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.54%.

Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are smaller than inTest quarterly revenues of $26.6M. Sequans Communications SA's net income of -$7.3M is lower than inTest's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.68x while inTest's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 2.69x versus 0.68x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WM Technology has a net margin of -90.07% compared to Sequans Communications SA's net margin of 3.69%. Sequans Communications SA's return on equity of 240.01% beat WM Technology's return on equity of 7%.

Sequans Communications SA has a consensus price target of $7.50, signalling upside risk potential of 94.3%. On the other hand WM Technology has an analysts' consensus of $2.61 which suggests that it could grow by 175.9%. Given that WM Technology has higher upside potential than Sequans Communications SA, analysts believe WM Technology is more attractive than Sequans Communications SA.

Sequans Communications SA has a beta of 0.438, which suggesting that the stock is 56.25% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WM Technology has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.26%.

Sequans Communications SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WM Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sequans Communications SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WM Technology pays out 100.56% of its earnings as a dividend.

Sequans Communications SA quarterly revenues are $8.1M, which are smaller than WM Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. Sequans Communications SA's net income of -$7.3M is lower than WM Technology's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Sequans Communications SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.68x while WM Technology's PE ratio is 11.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sequans Communications SA is 2.69x versus 0.51x for WM Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.