OLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

UiPath has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of -6.33%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat UiPath's return on equity of -3.7%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand UiPath has an analysts' consensus of $14.39 which suggests that it could grow by 16.01%. Given that UiPath has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe UiPath is more attractive than Olo.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UiPath has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UiPath offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UiPath pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are smaller than UiPath quarterly revenues of $356.6M. Olo's net income of $1.8M is higher than UiPath's net income of -$22.6M. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 507.50x while UiPath's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.74x versus 4.74x for UiPath. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Signing Day Sports has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of -568.22%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat Signing Day Sports's return on equity of --.

Olo has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand Signing Day Sports has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Olo has higher upside potential than Signing Day Sports, analysts believe Olo is more attractive than Signing Day Sports.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Signing Day Sports has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Signing Day Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Signing Day Sports pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are larger than Signing Day Sports quarterly revenues of $148.4K. Olo's net income of $1.8M is higher than Signing Day Sports's net income of -$843K. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 507.50x while Signing Day Sports's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.74x versus 3.68x for Signing Day Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Toast has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of 4.19%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat Toast's return on equity of 11.09%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand Toast has an analysts' consensus of $44.40 which suggests that it could fall by -3.14%. Given that Olo has higher upside potential than Toast, analysts believe Olo is more attractive than Toast.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Toast has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Toast offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Toast pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are smaller than Toast quarterly revenues of $1.3B. Olo's net income of $1.8M is lower than Toast's net income of $56M. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 507.50x while Toast's PE ratio is 196.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.74x versus 5.35x for Toast. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

WidePoint has a net margin of 2.24% compared to Olo's net margin of -2.12%. Olo's return on equity of 0.49% beat WidePoint's return on equity of -14.61%.

Olo has a consensus price target of $10.25, signalling upside risk potential of 0.99%. On the other hand WidePoint has an analysts' consensus of $7.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.85%. Given that WidePoint has higher upside potential than Olo, analysts believe WidePoint is more attractive than Olo.

Olo has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WidePoint has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.329%.

Olo has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. WidePoint offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Olo pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WidePoint pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Olo quarterly revenues are $80.7M, which are larger than WidePoint quarterly revenues of $34.2M. Olo's net income of $1.8M is higher than WidePoint's net income of -$724.1K. Notably, Olo's price-to-earnings ratio is 507.50x while WidePoint's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Olo is 5.74x versus 0.21x for WidePoint. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.