NTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 0.22% compared to Nutrien's net margin of -10.69%. Nutrien's return on equity of 2.13% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Nutrien has a consensus price target of $64.19, signalling upside risk potential of 9.81%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $9.07 which suggests that it could fall by -0.79%. Given that Nutrien has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Nutrien is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.533% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.908, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.847%.

Nutrien has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien pays 157.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutrien quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Nutrien's net income of $11M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Nutrien's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.64x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien is 1.12x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexible Solutions International has a net margin of 0.22% compared to Nutrien's net margin of -3.72%. Nutrien's return on equity of 2.13% beat Flexible Solutions International's return on equity of 5.71%.

Nutrien has a consensus price target of $64.19, signalling upside risk potential of 9.81%. On the other hand Flexible Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 54.64%. Given that Flexible Solutions International has higher upside potential than Nutrien, analysts believe Flexible Solutions International is more attractive than Nutrien.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.533% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexible Solutions International has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.469%.

Nutrien has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Flexible Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Nutrien pays 157.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International pays out 41.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexible Solutions International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Nutrien's is not.

Nutrien quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Flexible Solutions International quarterly revenues of $7.5M. Nutrien's net income of $11M is higher than Flexible Solutions International's net income of -$277.7K. Notably, Nutrien's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.64x while Flexible Solutions International's PE ratio is 32.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien is 1.12x versus 2.03x for Flexible Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 0.22% compared to Nutrien's net margin of --. Nutrien's return on equity of 2.13% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Nutrien has a consensus price target of $64.19, signalling upside risk potential of 9.81%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.70 which suggests that it could grow by 149.19%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Nutrien, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Nutrien.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.533% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.451%.

Nutrien has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien pays 157.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutrien quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Nutrien's net income of $11M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Nutrien's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.64x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien is 1.12x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 0.22% compared to Nutrien's net margin of --. Nutrien's return on equity of 2.13% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Nutrien has a consensus price target of $64.19, signalling upside risk potential of 9.81%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Nutrien, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Nutrien.

Nutrien has a beta of 0.805, which suggesting that the stock is 19.533% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

Nutrien has a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.71%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nutrien pays 157.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nutrien quarterly revenues are $5.1B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Nutrien's net income of $11M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Nutrien's price-to-earnings ratio is 54.64x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nutrien is 1.12x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.