CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 1.99%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Nucor's return on equity of 6.22%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $9.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.79%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $149.99 which suggests that it could grow by 8.85%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.705, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.46%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Nucor's net income of $156M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor's PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 1.07x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 4.97%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $9.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.79%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $149.07 which suggests that it could grow by 16.94%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.988%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 16.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 1.14x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 6.69%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Worthington Steel's return on equity of 9.63%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $9.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.79%. On the other hand Worthington Steel has an analysts' consensus of $34.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.29%. Given that Worthington Steel has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Worthington Steel is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worthington Steel offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel pays out 28.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Worthington Steel quarterly revenues of $832.9M. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Worthington Steel's net income of $55.7M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Worthington Steel's PE ratio is 14.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 0.52x for Worthington Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of -10.69% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of --. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $9.07, signalling downside risk potential of -0.79%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 128.94%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.908, which suggesting that the stock is 90.847% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.534%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M is lower than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.