MSGS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a net margin of -3.35% compared to Madison Square Garden Sports's net margin of -87.67%. Madison Square Garden Sports's return on equity of -- beat Atlanta Braves Holdings's return on equity of -4.12%.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a consensus price target of $244.39, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Atlanta Braves Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Madison Square Garden Sports has higher upside potential than Atlanta Braves Holdings, analysts believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more attractive than Atlanta Braves Holdings.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.412% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlanta Braves Holdings has a beta of 0.770, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.983%.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atlanta Braves Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Madison Square Garden Sports pays 1.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlanta Braves Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Sports's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Madison Square Garden Sports quarterly revenues are $424.2M, which are larger than Atlanta Braves Holdings quarterly revenues of $47.2M. Madison Square Garden Sports's net income of -$14.2M is higher than Atlanta Braves Holdings's net income of -$41.4M. Notably, Madison Square Garden Sports's price-to-earnings ratio is 992.86x while Atlanta Braves Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Madison Square Garden Sports is 4.73x versus 4.62x for Atlanta Braves Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LiveOne has a net margin of -3.35% compared to Madison Square Garden Sports's net margin of -41.16%. Madison Square Garden Sports's return on equity of -- beat LiveOne's return on equity of -885%.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a consensus price target of $244.39, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand LiveOne has an analysts' consensus of $2.53 which suggests that it could grow by 227.92%. Given that LiveOne has higher upside potential than Madison Square Garden Sports, analysts believe LiveOne is more attractive than Madison Square Garden Sports.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.412% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LiveOne has a beta of 1.663, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.341%.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. LiveOne offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Madison Square Garden Sports pays 1.19% of its earnings as a dividend. LiveOne pays out -2.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Sports's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Madison Square Garden Sports quarterly revenues are $424.2M, which are larger than LiveOne quarterly revenues of $19.3M. Madison Square Garden Sports's net income of -$14.2M is lower than LiveOne's net income of -$7.9M. Notably, Madison Square Garden Sports's price-to-earnings ratio is 992.86x while LiveOne's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Madison Square Garden Sports is 4.73x versus 0.64x for LiveOne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Live Nation Entertainment has a net margin of -3.35% compared to Madison Square Garden Sports's net margin of 0.69%. Madison Square Garden Sports's return on equity of -- beat Live Nation Entertainment's return on equity of 54%.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a consensus price target of $244.39, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Live Nation Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $162.74 which suggests that it could grow by 9.52%. Given that Madison Square Garden Sports has higher upside potential than Live Nation Entertainment, analysts believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more attractive than Live Nation Entertainment.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.412% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Live Nation Entertainment has a beta of 1.454, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.44%.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Live Nation Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Madison Square Garden Sports pays 1.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Live Nation Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Sports's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Madison Square Garden Sports quarterly revenues are $424.2M, which are smaller than Live Nation Entertainment quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Madison Square Garden Sports's net income of -$14.2M is lower than Live Nation Entertainment's net income of $23.2M. Notably, Madison Square Garden Sports's price-to-earnings ratio is 992.86x while Live Nation Entertainment's PE ratio is 50.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Madison Square Garden Sports is 4.73x versus 1.57x for Live Nation Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reservoir Media has a net margin of -3.35% compared to Madison Square Garden Sports's net margin of 6.44%. Madison Square Garden Sports's return on equity of -- beat Reservoir Media's return on equity of 2.16%.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a consensus price target of $244.39, signalling upside risk potential of 17.22%. On the other hand Reservoir Media has an analysts' consensus of $13.25 which suggests that it could grow by 80.27%. Given that Reservoir Media has higher upside potential than Madison Square Garden Sports, analysts believe Reservoir Media is more attractive than Madison Square Garden Sports.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 0.796, which suggesting that the stock is 20.412% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reservoir Media has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reservoir Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Madison Square Garden Sports pays 1.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Reservoir Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Sports's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Madison Square Garden Sports quarterly revenues are $424.2M, which are larger than Reservoir Media quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Madison Square Garden Sports's net income of -$14.2M is lower than Reservoir Media's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Madison Square Garden Sports's price-to-earnings ratio is 992.86x while Reservoir Media's PE ratio is 65.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Madison Square Garden Sports is 4.73x versus 3.04x for Reservoir Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.