BATRA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Liberty Live Group has a net margin of -87.67% compared to Atlanta Braves Holdings's net margin of --. Atlanta Braves Holdings's return on equity of -4.12% beat Liberty Live Group's return on equity of --.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Liberty Live Group has an analysts' consensus of $89.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.56%. Given that Liberty Live Group has higher upside potential than Atlanta Braves Holdings, analysts believe Liberty Live Group is more attractive than Atlanta Braves Holdings.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 22.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Liberty Live Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Liberty Live Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atlanta Braves Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Liberty Live Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atlanta Braves Holdings quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are larger than Liberty Live Group quarterly revenues of --. Atlanta Braves Holdings's net income of -$41.4M is lower than Liberty Live Group's net income of -$17M. Notably, Atlanta Braves Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Liberty Live Group's PE ratio is 291.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atlanta Braves Holdings is 4.62x versus -- for Liberty Live Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Live Nation Entertainment has a net margin of -87.67% compared to Atlanta Braves Holdings's net margin of 0.69%. Atlanta Braves Holdings's return on equity of -4.12% beat Live Nation Entertainment's return on equity of 54%.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Live Nation Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $162.74 which suggests that it could grow by 9.52%. Given that Live Nation Entertainment has higher upside potential than Atlanta Braves Holdings, analysts believe Live Nation Entertainment is more attractive than Atlanta Braves Holdings.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 22.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Live Nation Entertainment has a beta of 1.454, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.44%.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Live Nation Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atlanta Braves Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Live Nation Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atlanta Braves Holdings quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are smaller than Live Nation Entertainment quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Atlanta Braves Holdings's net income of -$41.4M is lower than Live Nation Entertainment's net income of $23.2M. Notably, Atlanta Braves Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Live Nation Entertainment's PE ratio is 50.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atlanta Braves Holdings is 4.62x versus 1.57x for Live Nation Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Madison Square Garden Sports has a net margin of -87.67% compared to Atlanta Braves Holdings's net margin of -3.35%. Atlanta Braves Holdings's return on equity of -4.12% beat Madison Square Garden Sports's return on equity of --.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Madison Square Garden Sports has an analysts' consensus of $244.39 which suggests that it could grow by 17.22%. Given that Madison Square Garden Sports has higher upside potential than Atlanta Braves Holdings, analysts believe Madison Square Garden Sports is more attractive than Atlanta Braves Holdings.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 22.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Madison Square Garden Sports has a beta of 0.796, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.412%.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Madison Square Garden Sports offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atlanta Braves Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Sports pays out 1.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Madison Square Garden Sports's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Atlanta Braves Holdings quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are smaller than Madison Square Garden Sports quarterly revenues of $424.2M. Atlanta Braves Holdings's net income of -$41.4M is lower than Madison Square Garden Sports's net income of -$14.2M. Notably, Atlanta Braves Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Madison Square Garden Sports's PE ratio is 992.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atlanta Braves Holdings is 4.62x versus 4.73x for Madison Square Garden Sports. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reservoir Media has a net margin of -87.67% compared to Atlanta Braves Holdings's net margin of 6.44%. Atlanta Braves Holdings's return on equity of -4.12% beat Reservoir Media's return on equity of 2.16%.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Reservoir Media has an analysts' consensus of $13.25 which suggests that it could grow by 80.27%. Given that Reservoir Media has higher upside potential than Atlanta Braves Holdings, analysts believe Reservoir Media is more attractive than Atlanta Braves Holdings.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a beta of 0.770, which suggesting that the stock is 22.983% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reservoir Media has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Atlanta Braves Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reservoir Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Atlanta Braves Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reservoir Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Atlanta Braves Holdings quarterly revenues are $47.2M, which are larger than Reservoir Media quarterly revenues of $41.4M. Atlanta Braves Holdings's net income of -$41.4M is lower than Reservoir Media's net income of $2.7M. Notably, Atlanta Braves Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reservoir Media's PE ratio is 65.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Atlanta Braves Holdings is 4.62x versus 3.04x for Reservoir Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.