ELF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coty has a net margin of 8.49% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of -31.23%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 15.56% beat Coty's return on equity of -9.31%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $128.96, signalling upside risk potential of 18.85%. On the other hand Coty has an analysts' consensus of $6.56 which suggests that it could grow by 32.28%. Given that Coty has higher upside potential than e.l.f. Beauty, analysts believe Coty is more attractive than e.l.f. Beauty.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.518, which suggesting that the stock is 51.808% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coty has a beta of 1.906, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.585%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coty offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coty pays out 14.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Coty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than Coty quarterly revenues of $1.3B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $28.3M is higher than Coty's net income of -$405.7M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.22x while Coty's PE ratio is 38.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 4.82x versus 0.72x for Coty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dollar Tree has a net margin of 8.49% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 7.4%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 15.56% beat Dollar Tree's return on equity of -49.43%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $128.96, signalling upside risk potential of 18.85%. On the other hand Dollar Tree has an analysts' consensus of $96.74 which suggests that it could fall by -9.26%. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than Dollar Tree, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Dollar Tree.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.518, which suggesting that the stock is 51.808% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dollar Tree has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.105%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Dollar Tree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dollar Tree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than Dollar Tree quarterly revenues of $4.6B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $28.3M is lower than Dollar Tree's net income of $343.4M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.22x while Dollar Tree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 4.82x versus 1.57x for Dollar Tree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pricesmart has a net margin of 8.49% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 2.67%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 15.56% beat Pricesmart's return on equity of 12.62%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $128.96, signalling upside risk potential of 18.85%. On the other hand Pricesmart has an analysts' consensus of $111.67 which suggests that it could grow by 3.05%. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than Pricesmart, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Pricesmart.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.518, which suggesting that the stock is 51.808% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pricesmart has a beta of 0.783, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.711%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pricesmart offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pricesmart pays out 47.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Pricesmart's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than Pricesmart quarterly revenues of $1.3B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $28.3M is lower than Pricesmart's net income of $35.2M. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.22x while Pricesmart's PE ratio is 22.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 4.82x versus 0.63x for Pricesmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Target has a net margin of 8.49% compared to e.l.f. Beauty's net margin of 4.35%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 15.56% beat Target's return on equity of 28.91%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $128.96, signalling upside risk potential of 18.85%. On the other hand Target has an analysts' consensus of $103.16 which suggests that it could grow by 1.8%. Given that e.l.f. Beauty has higher upside potential than Target, analysts believe e.l.f. Beauty is more attractive than Target.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.518, which suggesting that the stock is 51.808% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Target has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.652%.

e.l.f. Beauty has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Target offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.12 per share. e.l.f. Beauty pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Target pays out 50.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Target's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

e.l.f. Beauty quarterly revenues are $332.6M, which are smaller than Target quarterly revenues of $23.8B. e.l.f. Beauty's net income of $28.3M is lower than Target's net income of $1B. Notably, e.l.f. Beauty's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.22x while Target's PE ratio is 11.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for e.l.f. Beauty is 4.82x versus 0.44x for Target. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.