CRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duluth Holdings has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Carter's's net margin of -14.89%. Carter's's return on equity of 19.48% beat Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -26.68%.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $29.60, signalling downside risk potential of -1.99%. On the other hand Duluth Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.85%. Given that Duluth Holdings has more downside risk than Carter's, analysts believe Carter's is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Carter's has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.433% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.779%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.78%. Duluth Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Duluth Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $629.8M, which are larger than Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues of $102.7M. Carter's's net income of $15.5M is higher than Duluth Holdings's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.68x while Duluth Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.38x versus 0.11x for Duluth Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Etsy has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Carter's's net margin of -8%. Carter's's return on equity of 19.48% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $29.60, signalling downside risk potential of -1.99%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $52.57 which suggests that it could fall by -6.19%. Given that Etsy has more downside risk than Carter's, analysts believe Carter's is more attractive than Etsy.

Carter's has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.433% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.791%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.78%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $629.8M, which are smaller than Etsy quarterly revenues of $651.2M. Carter's's net income of $15.5M is higher than Etsy's net income of -$52.1M. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.68x while Etsy's PE ratio is 40.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.38x versus 2.48x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Natural Health Trends has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Carter's's net margin of 1.14%. Carter's's return on equity of 19.48% beat Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44%.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $29.60, signalling downside risk potential of -1.99%. On the other hand Natural Health Trends has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 566.67%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Carter's, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.433% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.611, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.942%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.78%. Natural Health Trends offers a yield of 17.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Natural Health Trends pays out 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Carter's's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Natural Health Trends's is not.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $629.8M, which are larger than Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Carter's's net income of $15.5M is higher than Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.68x while Natural Health Trends's PE ratio is 84.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.38x versus 1.21x for Natural Health Trends. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of 2.47% compared to Carter's's net margin of 5.17%. Carter's's return on equity of 19.48% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Carter's has a consensus price target of $29.60, signalling downside risk potential of -1.99%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $55.05 which suggests that it could fall by -1.76%. Given that Carter's has more downside risk than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Tractor Supply is more attractive than Carter's.

Carter's has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.433% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.604%.

Carter's has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.78%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Carter's pays 62.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Carter's quarterly revenues are $629.8M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Carter's's net income of $15.5M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Carter's's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.68x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 27.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Carter's is 0.38x versus 2.01x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.