NHTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Duluth Holdings has a net margin of 1.14% compared to Natural Health Trends's net margin of -14.89%. Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44% beat Duluth Holdings's return on equity of -26.68%.

Natural Health Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 566.67%. On the other hand Duluth Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could fall by -3.85%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Duluth Holdings, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Duluth Holdings.

Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.942% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Duluth Holdings has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.779%.

Natural Health Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.78%. Duluth Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Health Trends pays 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Duluth Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Duluth Holdings quarterly revenues of $102.7M. Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K is higher than Duluth Holdings's net income of -$15.3M. Notably, Natural Health Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.83x while Duluth Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Health Trends is 1.21x versus 0.11x for Duluth Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Etsy has a net margin of 1.14% compared to Natural Health Trends's net margin of -8%. Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44% beat Etsy's return on equity of --.

Natural Health Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 566.67%. On the other hand Etsy has an analysts' consensus of $52.57 which suggests that it could fall by -6.19%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Etsy, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Etsy.

Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.942% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Etsy has a beta of 1.738, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.791%.

Natural Health Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.78%. Etsy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Health Trends pays 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Etsy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Etsy quarterly revenues of $651.2M. Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K is higher than Etsy's net income of -$52.1M. Notably, Natural Health Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.83x while Etsy's PE ratio is 40.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Health Trends is 1.21x versus 2.48x for Etsy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Leslies has a net margin of 1.14% compared to Natural Health Trends's net margin of -28.97%. Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44% beat Leslies's return on equity of --.

Natural Health Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 566.67%. On the other hand Leslies has an analysts' consensus of $1.37 which suggests that it could grow by 236.19%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Leslies, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Leslies.

Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.942% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Leslies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Natural Health Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.78%. Leslies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Natural Health Trends pays 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Leslies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Leslies quarterly revenues of $177.1M. Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K is higher than Leslies's net income of -$51.3M. Notably, Natural Health Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.83x while Leslies's PE ratio is 151.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Health Trends is 1.21x versus 0.06x for Leslies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of 1.14% compared to Natural Health Trends's net margin of 5.17%. Natural Health Trends's return on equity of 1.44% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 48.21%.

Natural Health Trends has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 566.67%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $55.05 which suggests that it could fall by -1.76%. Given that Natural Health Trends has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Natural Health Trends is more attractive than Tractor Supply.

Natural Health Trends has a beta of 0.611, which suggesting that the stock is 38.942% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.604%.

Natural Health Trends has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 17.78%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Natural Health Trends pays 1610.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Natural Health Trends's is not.

Natural Health Trends quarterly revenues are $10.7M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Natural Health Trends's net income of $122K is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $179.4M. Notably, Natural Health Trends's price-to-earnings ratio is 84.83x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 27.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Natural Health Trends is 1.21x versus 2.01x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.