CNK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marcus has a net margin of -7.19% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of -11.3%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 54.93% beat Marcus's return on equity of -2.8%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.18, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Marcus has an analysts' consensus of $24.67 which suggests that it could grow by 43.49%. Given that Marcus has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, analysts believe Marcus is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 1.880, which suggesting that the stock is 87.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.88%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Marcus offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus pays out -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $540.7M, which are larger than Marcus quarterly revenues of $148.8M. Cinemark Holdings's net income of -$38.9M is lower than Marcus's net income of -$16.8M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.74x while Marcus's PE ratio is 54.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.47x versus 0.73x for Marcus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of -7.19% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of 27.42%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 54.93% beat Netflix's return on equity of 40.31%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.18, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $1,231.31 which suggests that it could fall by -1.52%. Given that Cinemark Holdings has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Cinemark Holdings is more attractive than Netflix.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 1.880, which suggesting that the stock is 87.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.312%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $540.7M, which are smaller than Netflix quarterly revenues of $10.5B. Cinemark Holdings's net income of -$38.9M is lower than Netflix's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.74x while Netflix's PE ratio is 59.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.47x versus 13.63x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -7.19% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of 2.11%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 54.93% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.18, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $11.98 which suggests that it could fall by -7.63%. Given that Cinemark Holdings has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Cinemark Holdings is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 1.880, which suggesting that the stock is 87.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.406%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $540.7M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Cinemark Holdings's net income of -$38.9M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.74x while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.47x versus 0.30x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reading International has a net margin of -7.19% compared to Cinemark Holdings's net margin of -11.83%. Cinemark Holdings's return on equity of 54.93% beat Reading International's return on equity of -729.14%.

Cinemark Holdings has a consensus price target of $34.18, signalling upside risk potential of 13.94%. On the other hand Reading International has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 90.84%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Cinemark Holdings, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Cinemark Holdings.

Cinemark Holdings has a beta of 1.880, which suggesting that the stock is 87.993% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reading International has a beta of 1.359, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.903%.

Cinemark Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.53%. Reading International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cinemark Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reading International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cinemark Holdings quarterly revenues are $540.7M, which are larger than Reading International quarterly revenues of $40.2M. Cinemark Holdings's net income of -$38.9M is lower than Reading International's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Cinemark Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.74x while Reading International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cinemark Holdings is 1.47x versus 0.15x for Reading International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.