RDI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Walt Disney has a net margin of -11.83% compared to Reading International's net margin of 13.87%. Reading International's return on equity of -729.14% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 8.4%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 90.84%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $129.48 which suggests that it could grow by 8.06%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than The Walt Disney, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than The Walt Disney.

Reading International has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.558, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.842%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $40.2M, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $23.6B. Reading International's net income of -$4.8M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 24.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.15x versus 2.32x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marcus has a net margin of -11.83% compared to Reading International's net margin of -11.3%. Reading International's return on equity of -729.14% beat Marcus's return on equity of -2.8%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 90.84%. On the other hand Marcus has an analysts' consensus of $24.67 which suggests that it could grow by 43.49%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Marcus, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Marcus.

Reading International has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marcus has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.88%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marcus offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marcus pays out -112.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $40.2M, which are smaller than Marcus quarterly revenues of $148.8M. Reading International's net income of -$4.8M is higher than Marcus's net income of -$16.8M. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marcus's PE ratio is 54.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.15x versus 0.73x for Marcus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of -11.83% compared to Reading International's net margin of 27.42%. Reading International's return on equity of -729.14% beat Netflix's return on equity of 40.31%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 90.84%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $1,231.31 which suggests that it could fall by -1.52%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Netflix, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Netflix.

Reading International has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.593, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.312%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $40.2M, which are smaller than Netflix quarterly revenues of $10.5B. Reading International's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Netflix's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netflix's PE ratio is 59.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.15x versus 13.63x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Global has a net margin of -11.83% compared to Reading International's net margin of 2.11%. Reading International's return on equity of -729.14% beat Paramount Global's return on equity of -30.44%.

Reading International has a consensus price target of $2.50, signalling upside risk potential of 90.84%. On the other hand Paramount Global has an analysts' consensus of $11.98 which suggests that it could fall by -7.63%. Given that Reading International has higher upside potential than Paramount Global, analysts believe Reading International is more attractive than Paramount Global.

Reading International has a beta of 1.359, which suggesting that the stock is 35.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Global has a beta of 1.194, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.406%.

Reading International has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Global offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Reading International pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Global pays out -2.71% of its earnings as a dividend.

Reading International quarterly revenues are $40.2M, which are smaller than Paramount Global quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Reading International's net income of -$4.8M is lower than Paramount Global's net income of $152M. Notably, Reading International's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paramount Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reading International is 0.15x versus 0.30x for Paramount Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.