BNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of -13.48% compared to Brookfield Wealth Solutions's net margin of 54.15%. Brookfield Wealth Solutions's return on equity of 4.61% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity of 7.84%.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.7%. On the other hand Assured Guaranty has an analysts' consensus of $106.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.36%. Given that Brookfield Wealth Solutions has higher upside potential than Assured Guaranty, analysts believe Brookfield Wealth Solutions is more attractive than Assured Guaranty.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.824, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.615%.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Assured Guaranty offers a yield of 1.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Brookfield Wealth Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 18.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Assured Guaranty's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Assured Guaranty quarterly revenues of $325M. Brookfield Wealth Solutions's net income of -$326M is lower than Assured Guaranty's net income of $176M. Notably, Brookfield Wealth Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.88x while Assured Guaranty's PE ratio is 9.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Wealth Solutions is 0.86x versus 4.69x for Assured Guaranty. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Conduit Holdings has a net margin of -13.48% compared to Brookfield Wealth Solutions's net margin of --. Brookfield Wealth Solutions's return on equity of 4.61% beat Conduit Holdings's return on equity of 12.2%.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.7%. On the other hand Conduit Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Brookfield Wealth Solutions has higher upside potential than Conduit Holdings, analysts believe Brookfield Wealth Solutions is more attractive than Conduit Holdings.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Conduit Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Conduit Holdings offers a yield of 5.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Brookfield Wealth Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings pays out 47.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Conduit Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Conduit Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Brookfield Wealth Solutions's net income of -$326M is higher than Conduit Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Brookfield Wealth Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.88x while Conduit Holdings's PE ratio is 7.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Wealth Solutions is 0.86x versus 1.32x for Conduit Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Everest Group has a net margin of -13.48% compared to Brookfield Wealth Solutions's net margin of 4.96%. Brookfield Wealth Solutions's return on equity of 4.61% beat Everest Group's return on equity of 5.97%.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.7%. On the other hand Everest Group has an analysts' consensus of $397.96 which suggests that it could grow by 19.9%. Given that Brookfield Wealth Solutions has higher upside potential than Everest Group, analysts believe Brookfield Wealth Solutions is more attractive than Everest Group.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Everest Group has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.307%.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Everest Group offers a yield of 2.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.00 per share. Brookfield Wealth Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group pays out 24.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Everest Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Everest Group quarterly revenues of $4.2B. Brookfield Wealth Solutions's net income of -$326M is lower than Everest Group's net income of $210M. Notably, Brookfield Wealth Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.88x while Everest Group's PE ratio is 17.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Wealth Solutions is 0.86x versus 0.82x for Everest Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of -13.48% compared to Brookfield Wealth Solutions's net margin of 10.35%. Brookfield Wealth Solutions's return on equity of 4.61% beat Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 13.83%.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 41.7%. On the other hand Hamilton Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $24.17 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that Brookfield Wealth Solutions has higher upside potential than Hamilton Insurance Group, analysts believe Brookfield Wealth Solutions is more attractive than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hamilton Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Brookfield Wealth Solutions pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hamilton Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Brookfield Wealth Solutions quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Hamilton Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $781.7M. Brookfield Wealth Solutions's net income of -$326M is lower than Hamilton Insurance Group's net income of $80.9M. Notably, Brookfield Wealth Solutions's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.88x while Hamilton Insurance Group's PE ratio is 6.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brookfield Wealth Solutions is 0.86x versus 0.91x for Hamilton Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.