BHLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Busey has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net margin of -24%. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's return on equity of 9.8% beat First Busey's return on equity of 3.79%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a consensus price target of $31.66, signalling upside risk potential of 21.11%. On the other hand First Busey has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.99%. Given that Berkshire Hills Bancorp has higher upside potential than First Busey, analysts believe Berkshire Hills Bancorp is more attractive than First Busey.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Busey has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.516%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. First Busey offers a yield of 4.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Berkshire Hills Bancorp pays 50.72% of its earnings as a dividend. First Busey pays out 47.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp quarterly revenues are $110.4M, which are smaller than First Busey quarterly revenues of $125M. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net income of $25.7M is higher than First Busey's net income of -$30M. Notably, Berkshire Hills Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.58x while First Busey's PE ratio is 22.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hills Bancorp is 2.59x versus 3.07x for First Busey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Broadway Financial has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net margin of -5.41%. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's return on equity of 9.8% beat Broadway Financial's return on equity of 0.58%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a consensus price target of $31.66, signalling upside risk potential of 21.11%. On the other hand Broadway Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Berkshire Hills Bancorp has higher upside potential than Broadway Financial, analysts believe Berkshire Hills Bancorp is more attractive than Broadway Financial.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadway Financial has a beta of 0.726, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.353%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Broadway Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berkshire Hills Bancorp pays 50.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadway Financial pays out 81.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp quarterly revenues are $110.4M, which are larger than Broadway Financial quarterly revenues of $8.3M. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net income of $25.7M is higher than Broadway Financial's net income of -$451K. Notably, Berkshire Hills Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.58x while Broadway Financial's PE ratio is 173.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hills Bancorp is 2.59x versus 2.09x for Broadway Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Carver Bancorp has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net margin of -64.55%. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's return on equity of 9.8% beat Carver Bancorp's return on equity of -37.37%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a consensus price target of $31.66, signalling upside risk potential of 21.11%. On the other hand Carver Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16204.34%. Given that Carver Bancorp has higher upside potential than Berkshire Hills Bancorp, analysts believe Carver Bancorp is more attractive than Berkshire Hills Bancorp.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Carver Bancorp has a beta of 1.215, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.491%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Carver Bancorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Berkshire Hills Bancorp pays 50.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Carver Bancorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp quarterly revenues are $110.4M, which are larger than Carver Bancorp quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net income of $25.7M is higher than Carver Bancorp's net income of -$3.8M. Notably, Berkshire Hills Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.58x while Carver Bancorp's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hills Bancorp is 2.59x versus 0.44x for Carver Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pathward Financial has a net margin of 23.29% compared to Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net margin of 34.03%. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's return on equity of 9.8% beat Pathward Financial's return on equity of 22.91%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a consensus price target of $31.66, signalling upside risk potential of 21.11%. On the other hand Pathward Financial has an analysts' consensus of $88.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.92%. Given that Berkshire Hills Bancorp has higher upside potential than Pathward Financial, analysts believe Berkshire Hills Bancorp is more attractive than Pathward Financial.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a beta of 0.615, which suggesting that the stock is 38.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pathward Financial has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.291%.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.44%. Pathward Financial offers a yield of 0.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Berkshire Hills Bancorp pays 50.72% of its earnings as a dividend. Pathward Financial pays out 3.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Berkshire Hills Bancorp quarterly revenues are $110.4M, which are smaller than Pathward Financial quarterly revenues of $218.2M. Berkshire Hills Bancorp's net income of $25.7M is lower than Pathward Financial's net income of $74.3M. Notably, Berkshire Hills Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.58x while Pathward Financial's PE ratio is 11.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Berkshire Hills Bancorp is 2.59x versus 3.23x for Pathward Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.