BHE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Plexus has a net margin of 0.58% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 3.99%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 4.82% beat Plexus's return on equity of 10.94%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand Plexus has an analysts' consensus of $153.40 which suggests that it could grow by 11.88%. Given that Benchmark Electronics has higher upside potential than Plexus, analysts believe Benchmark Electronics is more attractive than Plexus.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 0.955, which suggesting that the stock is 4.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plexus has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.602%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Plexus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 37.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Plexus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $631.8M, which are smaller than Plexus quarterly revenues of $980.2M. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $3.6M is lower than Plexus's net income of $39.1M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.02x while Plexus's PE ratio is 26.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.55x versus 0.96x for Plexus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sanmina has a net margin of 0.58% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 3.24%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 4.82% beat Sanmina's return on equity of 10.22%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand Sanmina has an analysts' consensus of $107.50 which suggests that it could grow by 3.2%. Given that Benchmark Electronics has higher upside potential than Sanmina, analysts believe Benchmark Electronics is more attractive than Sanmina.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 0.955, which suggesting that the stock is 4.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sanmina has a beta of 1.169, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.871%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Sanmina offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 37.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sanmina pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $631.8M, which are smaller than Sanmina quarterly revenues of $2B. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $3.6M is lower than Sanmina's net income of $64.2M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.02x while Sanmina's PE ratio is 24.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.55x versus 0.74x for Sanmina. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sigmatron International has a net margin of 0.58% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 5.47%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 4.82% beat Sigmatron International's return on equity of -19.8%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand Sigmatron International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Benchmark Electronics has higher upside potential than Sigmatron International, analysts believe Benchmark Electronics is more attractive than Sigmatron International.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 0.955, which suggesting that the stock is 4.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sigmatron International has a beta of 1.449, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.906%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Sigmatron International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 37.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Sigmatron International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $631.8M, which are larger than Sigmatron International quarterly revenues of $71.1M. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $3.6M is lower than Sigmatron International's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.02x while Sigmatron International's PE ratio is 24.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.55x versus 0.06x for Sigmatron International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TTM Technologies has a net margin of 0.58% compared to Benchmark Electronics's net margin of 4.96%. Benchmark Electronics's return on equity of 4.82% beat TTM Technologies's return on equity of 5.03%.

Benchmark Electronics has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.86%. On the other hand TTM Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $43.50 which suggests that it could fall by -12.68%. Given that Benchmark Electronics has higher upside potential than TTM Technologies, analysts believe Benchmark Electronics is more attractive than TTM Technologies.

Benchmark Electronics has a beta of 0.955, which suggesting that the stock is 4.519% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TTM Technologies has a beta of 1.458, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.832%.

Benchmark Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. TTM Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Benchmark Electronics pays 37.76% of its earnings as a dividend. TTM Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Benchmark Electronics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Benchmark Electronics quarterly revenues are $631.8M, which are smaller than TTM Technologies quarterly revenues of $648.7M. Benchmark Electronics's net income of $3.6M is lower than TTM Technologies's net income of $32.2M. Notably, Benchmark Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.02x while TTM Technologies's PE ratio is 61.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Benchmark Electronics is 0.55x versus 1.89x for TTM Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.