SANM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jabil has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.84%. Sanmina's return on equity of 10.22% beat Jabil's return on equity of 34.97%.

Sanmina has a consensus price target of $107.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.2%. On the other hand Jabil has an analysts' consensus of $221.02 which suggests that it could grow by 1.25%. Given that Sanmina has higher upside potential than Jabil, analysts believe Sanmina is more attractive than Jabil.

Sanmina has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.263%.

Sanmina has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil offers a yield of 0.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Sanmina pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil pays out 3.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sanmina quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Jabil quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Sanmina's net income of $64.2M is lower than Jabil's net income of $222M. Notably, Sanmina's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.11x while Jabil's PE ratio is 42.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sanmina is 0.74x versus 0.86x for Jabil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 42.61%. Sanmina's return on equity of 10.22% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Sanmina has a consensus price target of $107.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.2%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $179.06 which suggests that it could grow by 4.49%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Sanmina, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Sanmina.

Sanmina has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.130, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 113.014%.

Sanmina has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Sanmina pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sanmina quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Sanmina's net income of $64.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Sanmina's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.11x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 55.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sanmina is 0.74x versus 28.54x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plexus has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 3.99%. Sanmina's return on equity of 10.22% beat Plexus's return on equity of 10.94%.

Sanmina has a consensus price target of $107.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.2%. On the other hand Plexus has an analysts' consensus of $153.40 which suggests that it could grow by 11.88%. Given that Plexus has higher upside potential than Sanmina, analysts believe Plexus is more attractive than Sanmina.

Sanmina has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plexus has a beta of 0.804, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.602%.

Sanmina has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plexus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sanmina pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plexus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sanmina quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Plexus quarterly revenues of $980.2M. Sanmina's net income of $64.2M is higher than Plexus's net income of $39.1M. Notably, Sanmina's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.11x while Plexus's PE ratio is 26.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sanmina is 0.74x versus 0.96x for Plexus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sigmatron International has a net margin of 3.24% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 5.47%. Sanmina's return on equity of 10.22% beat Sigmatron International's return on equity of -19.8%.

Sanmina has a consensus price target of $107.50, signalling upside risk potential of 3.2%. On the other hand Sigmatron International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sanmina has higher upside potential than Sigmatron International, analysts believe Sanmina is more attractive than Sigmatron International.

Sanmina has a beta of 1.169, which suggesting that the stock is 16.871% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sigmatron International has a beta of 1.449, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.906%.

Sanmina has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sigmatron International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sanmina pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sigmatron International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sanmina quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Sigmatron International quarterly revenues of $71.1M. Sanmina's net income of $64.2M is higher than Sigmatron International's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Sanmina's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.11x while Sigmatron International's PE ratio is 24.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sanmina is 0.74x versus 0.06x for Sigmatron International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.