AYI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Acuity's net margin of --. Acuity's return on equity of 16.45% beat Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products's return on equity of --.

Acuity has a consensus price target of $335.57, signalling upside risk potential of 15.29%. On the other hand Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Acuity has higher upside potential than Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products, analysts believe Acuity is more attractive than Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products.

Acuity has a beta of 1.619, which suggesting that the stock is 61.894% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products has a beta of -2.266, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 326.587%.

Acuity has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acuity pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acuity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products quarterly revenues of --. Acuity's net income of $98.4M is higher than Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products's net income of --. Notably, Acuity's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.94x while Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity is 2.21x versus -- for Brite-Strike Tactical Illumination Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimball Electronics has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Acuity's net margin of 1.02%. Acuity's return on equity of 16.45% beat Kimball Electronics's return on equity of 3.31%.

Acuity has a consensus price target of $335.57, signalling upside risk potential of 15.29%. On the other hand Kimball Electronics has an analysts' consensus of $19.75 which suggests that it could grow by 2.02%. Given that Acuity has higher upside potential than Kimball Electronics, analysts believe Acuity is more attractive than Kimball Electronics.

Acuity has a beta of 1.619, which suggesting that the stock is 61.894% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimball Electronics has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.2%.

Acuity has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Kimball Electronics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acuity pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimball Electronics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acuity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Kimball Electronics quarterly revenues of $374.6M. Acuity's net income of $98.4M is higher than Kimball Electronics's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Acuity's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.94x while Kimball Electronics's PE ratio is 27.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity is 2.21x versus 0.32x for Kimball Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lindsay has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Acuity's net margin of 11.51%. Acuity's return on equity of 16.45% beat Lindsay's return on equity of 15.23%.

Acuity has a consensus price target of $335.57, signalling upside risk potential of 15.29%. On the other hand Lindsay has an analysts' consensus of $143.00 which suggests that it could grow by 3.15%. Given that Acuity has higher upside potential than Lindsay, analysts believe Acuity is more attractive than Lindsay.

Acuity has a beta of 1.619, which suggesting that the stock is 61.894% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lindsay has a beta of 0.820, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.012%.

Acuity has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. Lindsay offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Acuity pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Lindsay pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Lindsay quarterly revenues of $169.5M. Acuity's net income of $98.4M is higher than Lindsay's net income of $19.5M. Notably, Acuity's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.94x while Lindsay's PE ratio is 19.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity is 2.21x versus 2.23x for Lindsay. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PGD Eco Solutions has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Acuity's net margin of --. Acuity's return on equity of 16.45% beat PGD Eco Solutions's return on equity of --.

Acuity has a consensus price target of $335.57, signalling upside risk potential of 15.29%. On the other hand PGD Eco Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Acuity has higher upside potential than PGD Eco Solutions, analysts believe Acuity is more attractive than PGD Eco Solutions.

Acuity has a beta of 1.619, which suggesting that the stock is 61.894% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PGD Eco Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Acuity has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.22%. PGD Eco Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Acuity pays 4.31% of its earnings as a dividend. PGD Eco Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Acuity's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Acuity quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than PGD Eco Solutions quarterly revenues of --. Acuity's net income of $98.4M is higher than PGD Eco Solutions's net income of --. Notably, Acuity's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.94x while PGD Eco Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Acuity is 2.21x versus -- for PGD Eco Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.