AVA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Exelon has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 13.52%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat Exelon's return on equity of 10.16%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.16%. On the other hand Exelon has an analysts' consensus of $47.17 which suggests that it could grow by 10.07%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than Exelon, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than Exelon.

Avista has a beta of 0.404, which suggesting that the stock is 59.642% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exelon has a beta of 0.384, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.603%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. Exelon offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Exelon pays out 61.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than Exelon quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Avista's net income of $79M is lower than Exelon's net income of $908M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.03x while Exelon's PE ratio is 15.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.54x versus 1.82x for Exelon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSource has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 21.75%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat NiSource's return on equity of 8.44%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.16%. On the other hand NiSource has an analysts' consensus of $43.23 which suggests that it could grow by 7.69%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than NiSource, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than NiSource.

Avista has a beta of 0.404, which suggesting that the stock is 59.642% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSource has a beta of 0.544, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.591%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. NiSource offers a yield of 2.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NiSource pays out 64.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than NiSource quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Avista's net income of $79M is lower than NiSource's net income of $474.8M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.03x while NiSource's PE ratio is 21.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.54x versus 3.12x for NiSource. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OGE Energy has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of 8.39%. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat OGE Energy's return on equity of 10.65%.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.16%. On the other hand OGE Energy has an analysts' consensus of $45.10 which suggests that it could grow by 2.21%. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than OGE Energy, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than OGE Energy.

Avista has a beta of 0.404, which suggesting that the stock is 59.642% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OGE Energy has a beta of 0.588, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.166%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. OGE Energy offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. OGE Energy pays out 76.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are smaller than OGE Energy quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Avista's net income of $79M is higher than OGE Energy's net income of $62.7M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.03x while OGE Energy's PE ratio is 18.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.54x versus 2.84x for OGE Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verde Clean Fuels has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Avista's net margin of --. Avista's return on equity of 7.32% beat Verde Clean Fuels's return on equity of --.

Avista has a consensus price target of $42.25, signalling upside risk potential of 12.16%. On the other hand Verde Clean Fuels has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Avista has higher upside potential than Verde Clean Fuels, analysts believe Avista is more attractive than Verde Clean Fuels.

Avista has a beta of 0.404, which suggesting that the stock is 59.642% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verde Clean Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Avista has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.12%. Verde Clean Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Avista pays 83.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Verde Clean Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avista's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Avista quarterly revenues are $617M, which are larger than Verde Clean Fuels quarterly revenues of --. Avista's net income of $79M is higher than Verde Clean Fuels's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Avista's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.03x while Verde Clean Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Avista is 1.54x versus -- for Verde Clean Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.