APTV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of -0.23% compared to Aptiv PLC's net margin of 4.26%. Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 15.36% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 7.32%.

Aptiv PLC has a consensus price target of $78.55, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 72.02%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than Aptiv PLC, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than Aptiv PLC.

Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.459, which suggesting that the stock is 45.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 151.28%.

Aptiv PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. Aptiv PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out 74.83% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $167.1M. Aptiv PLC's net income of -$11M is lower than China Automotive Systems's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Aptiv PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 4.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aptiv PLC is 0.88x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -0.23% compared to Aptiv PLC's net margin of -3528.43%. Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 15.36% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Aptiv PLC has a consensus price target of $78.55, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than Aptiv PLC, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than Aptiv PLC.

Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.459, which suggesting that the stock is 45.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

Aptiv PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aptiv PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. Aptiv PLC's net income of -$11M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, Aptiv PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aptiv PLC is 0.88x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mobileye Global has a net margin of -0.23% compared to Aptiv PLC's net margin of -23.29%. Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 15.36% beat Mobileye Global's return on equity of -22.64%.

Aptiv PLC has a consensus price target of $78.55, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand Mobileye Global has an analysts' consensus of $19.82 which suggests that it could grow by 25.07%. Given that Mobileye Global has higher upside potential than Aptiv PLC, analysts believe Mobileye Global is more attractive than Aptiv PLC.

Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.459, which suggesting that the stock is 45.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mobileye Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aptiv PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mobileye Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aptiv PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mobileye Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are larger than Mobileye Global quarterly revenues of $438M. Aptiv PLC's net income of -$11M is higher than Mobileye Global's net income of -$102M. Notably, Aptiv PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while Mobileye Global's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aptiv PLC is 0.88x versus 6.93x for Mobileye Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -0.23% compared to Aptiv PLC's net margin of 2.12%. Aptiv PLC's return on equity of 15.36% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Aptiv PLC has a consensus price target of $78.55, signalling upside risk potential of 12%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $304.17 which suggests that it could fall by -5.44%. Given that Aptiv PLC has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Aptiv PLC is more attractive than Tesla.

Aptiv PLC has a beta of 1.459, which suggesting that the stock is 45.874% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.394, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 139.423%.

Aptiv PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aptiv PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aptiv PLC quarterly revenues are $4.8B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Aptiv PLC's net income of -$11M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Aptiv PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.61x while Tesla's PE ratio is 176.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aptiv PLC is 0.88x versus 11.78x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.