BWA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Commercial Vehicle Group has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of -2.54%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Commercial Vehicle Group's return on equity of -22.04%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $39.27, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand Commercial Vehicle Group has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 112.77%. Given that Commercial Vehicle Group has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Commercial Vehicle Group is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.089, which suggesting that the stock is 8.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Vehicle Group has a beta of 2.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.11%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Commercial Vehicle Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Vehicle Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Commercial Vehicle Group quarterly revenues of $169.8M. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Commercial Vehicle Group's net income of -$4.3M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.18x while Commercial Vehicle Group's PE ratio is 1.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.56x versus 0.09x for Commercial Vehicle Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dana has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 1.06%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Dana's return on equity of -2.06%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $39.27, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand Dana has an analysts' consensus of $22.57 which suggests that it could grow by 33.32%. Given that Dana has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Dana is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.089, which suggesting that the stock is 8.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dana has a beta of 2.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.299%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Dana offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Dana pays out -101.75% of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Dana quarterly revenues of $2.4B. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Dana's net income of $25M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.18x while Dana's PE ratio is 147.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.56x versus 0.25x for Dana. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of -3528.43%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $39.27, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Hyliion Holdings has higher upside potential than BorgWarner, analysts believe Hyliion Holdings is more attractive than BorgWarner.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.089, which suggesting that the stock is 8.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 158.605%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of $489K. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$17.3M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.18x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.56x versus 124.74x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 4.47% compared to BorgWarner's net margin of 3.75%. BorgWarner's return on equity of 4.77% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 8.82%.

BorgWarner has a consensus price target of $39.27, signalling upside risk potential of 11.66%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $66.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.98%. Given that BorgWarner has higher upside potential than Strattec Security, analysts believe BorgWarner is more attractive than Strattec Security.

BorgWarner has a beta of 1.089, which suggesting that the stock is 8.934% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.917%.

BorgWarner has a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.25%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BorgWarner pays 28.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BorgWarner's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BorgWarner quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $144.1M. BorgWarner's net income of $157M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $5.4M. Notably, BorgWarner's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.18x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 12.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BorgWarner is 0.56x versus 0.46x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.