ALV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cooper-Standard Holdings has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Autoliv's net margin of 0.23%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.32% beat Cooper-Standard Holdings's return on equity of --.

Autoliv has a consensus price target of $122.80, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Cooper-Standard Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.49%. Given that Cooper-Standard Holdings has higher upside potential than Autoliv, analysts believe Cooper-Standard Holdings is more attractive than Autoliv.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cooper-Standard Holdings has a beta of 2.795, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 179.507%.

Autoliv has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Cooper-Standard Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoliv pays 33.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Cooper-Standard Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoliv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Cooper-Standard Holdings quarterly revenues of $667.1M. Autoliv's net income of $167M is higher than Cooper-Standard Holdings's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Autoliv's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.44x while Cooper-Standard Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv is 0.89x versus 0.15x for Cooper-Standard Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentex has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Autoliv's net margin of 16.45%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.32% beat Gentex's return on equity of 16.1%.

Autoliv has a consensus price target of $122.80, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Gentex has an analysts' consensus of $28.51 which suggests that it could grow by 23.26%. Given that Gentex has higher upside potential than Autoliv, analysts believe Gentex is more attractive than Autoliv.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentex has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.642%.

Autoliv has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Gentex offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Autoliv pays 33.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Gentex pays out 27.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Gentex quarterly revenues of $576.8M. Autoliv's net income of $167M is higher than Gentex's net income of $94.9M. Notably, Autoliv's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.44x while Gentex's PE ratio is 13.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv is 0.89x versus 2.26x for Gentex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Optec International has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Autoliv's net margin of --. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.32% beat Optec International's return on equity of --.

Autoliv has a consensus price target of $122.80, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Optec International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Autoliv has higher upside potential than Optec International, analysts believe Autoliv is more attractive than Optec International.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Optec International has a beta of 2.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.261%.

Autoliv has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Optec International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoliv pays 33.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Optec International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoliv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Optec International quarterly revenues of --. Autoliv's net income of $167M is higher than Optec International's net income of --. Notably, Autoliv's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.44x while Optec International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv is 0.89x versus -- for Optec International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solid Power has a net margin of 6.48% compared to Autoliv's net margin of -251.85%. Autoliv's return on equity of 29.32% beat Solid Power's return on equity of -20.72%.

Autoliv has a consensus price target of $122.80, signalling upside risk potential of 5.16%. On the other hand Solid Power has an analysts' consensus of $2.00 which suggests that it could fall by -53.42%. Given that Autoliv has higher upside potential than Solid Power, analysts believe Autoliv is more attractive than Solid Power.

Autoliv has a beta of 1.373, which suggesting that the stock is 37.272% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solid Power has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Autoliv has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Solid Power offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Autoliv pays 33.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Solid Power pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autoliv's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Autoliv quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Solid Power quarterly revenues of $6M. Autoliv's net income of $167M is higher than Solid Power's net income of -$15.2M. Notably, Autoliv's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.44x while Solid Power's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Autoliv is 0.89x versus 28.62x for Solid Power. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.